Debates in Nineteenth-Century European Philosophy 2015
DOI: 10.4324/9781315686837-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fichte’s Original Insight

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the variegated and multi-disciplinary literature on self-representation, the concept of "pre-reflective" self-consciousness has become an important subtopic of debate [4,5,[119][120][121]. The idea that consciousness always involves a form of pre-reflective self-consciousness is the hypothesis that there is a genuine reflexive (versus reflective) form of self-consciousness that (i) does not require a distinct, higher-order mapping or meta-representation S 2 (a representation of a representation) of subjective consciousness S 1 at the first-order, (ii) is truly embedded in the space of awareness itself, as elusive as it may be, and (iii) is a necessary basis for higher-order, reflective self-awareness.…”
Section: The Anti-space and Pre-reflective Self-awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the variegated and multi-disciplinary literature on self-representation, the concept of "pre-reflective" self-consciousness has become an important subtopic of debate [4,5,[119][120][121]. The idea that consciousness always involves a form of pre-reflective self-consciousness is the hypothesis that there is a genuine reflexive (versus reflective) form of self-consciousness that (i) does not require a distinct, higher-order mapping or meta-representation S 2 (a representation of a representation) of subjective consciousness S 1 at the first-order, (ii) is truly embedded in the space of awareness itself, as elusive as it may be, and (iii) is a necessary basis for higher-order, reflective self-awareness.…”
Section: The Anti-space and Pre-reflective Self-awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(I am grateful to an anonymous reviewer for the suggestion to attend to Fichte. My comments are on the basis mainly of [ 8 ], a translation of an exposition by Fichte of SoK, with some matters, including about later developments of SoK, illuminated by [ 69 , 74 , 75 , 76 ]. Page references in double square brackets refer into [ 8 ].)…”
Section: Discussion and Additional Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…211, 261, 266), a feeling of limitation (pp. 21, 266), longing (p. 265), and, notably, a non-conceptual “intuition” that the self has of its own existence ([ 75 ], p. 261). This last is highly analogous to a specific core feeling that MDyn proposes in Section 5.2 , the feeling of own continuing existence.…”
Section: Discussion and Additional Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In philosophical discussions this kind of human consciousness is often called self-consciousness. When Dewart denies that he means self-consciousness, he actually concurs with Henrich's[12,13] and others' criticism against the vicious circularity of the theories where self-consciousness develops so that the subject or her consciousness takes itself as its object 6. This is a controversial hypothesis which is extremely difficult to test empirically.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This negativity as a basic character of education is perhaps more intelligible in the continental tradition starting with the post-Kantian pedagogical paradox[56][57][58] and it is exceptionally explicitly reflected by Dietrich Benner in[59,60] 33 And thus, also the action of consciousness. Here is a strong and interesting parallel connection to the philosophy of Fichte, which, however, must be bypassed in this article (see more in[13,63]). Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 24 February 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202102.0546.v1…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%