2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.02.088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fibromatosis of the tongue: A case report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The histologic features of CFTs are reasonably distinct and usually allow easy recognition from other reactive or benign neoplastic lesions that one might consider in the differential diagnosis. The most common are IMT, [18] ( Table 1), desmoid fibromatosis, [19] nodular fasciitis, [20] and solitary fibrous tumor [21] (Table 2). Other oral lesions that should be distinguished from CFT are: desmoplastic fibroblastoma [22], true fibroma [23], giant cell fibroma, [24] irritation fibroma [25] and amyloidoma [26] (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The histologic features of CFTs are reasonably distinct and usually allow easy recognition from other reactive or benign neoplastic lesions that one might consider in the differential diagnosis. The most common are IMT, [18] ( Table 1), desmoid fibromatosis, [19] nodular fasciitis, [20] and solitary fibrous tumor [21] (Table 2). Other oral lesions that should be distinguished from CFT are: desmoplastic fibroblastoma [22], true fibroma [23], giant cell fibroma, [24] irritation fibroma [25] and amyloidoma [26] (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%