2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 gene amplification status and its clinicopathologic significance in gastric carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

11
70
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
11
70
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…13,18 In this large-scale study with 1974 gastric cancer patients, FGFR2 amplification and FGFR2b overexpression were more commonly identified in poorly differentiated tumors with diffuse histology, which is different from other reports. 4,15 Diffuse histology was found in most tumors with high 15 In this study, although FGFR2 amplification itself was not associated with overall survival, FGFR2b overexpression with high H-score showed strong prognostic value for survival. Considering the controversial clinical significance and high intratumoral heterogeneity of FGFR2 amplification in gastric cancer, 13,18 the extent of FGFR2b overexpression, rather than the presence of FGFR2 amplification itself, may be a better predictor of patient survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13,18 In this large-scale study with 1974 gastric cancer patients, FGFR2 amplification and FGFR2b overexpression were more commonly identified in poorly differentiated tumors with diffuse histology, which is different from other reports. 4,15 Diffuse histology was found in most tumors with high 15 In this study, although FGFR2 amplification itself was not associated with overall survival, FGFR2b overexpression with high H-score showed strong prognostic value for survival. Considering the controversial clinical significance and high intratumoral heterogeneity of FGFR2 amplification in gastric cancer, 13,18 the extent of FGFR2b overexpression, rather than the presence of FGFR2 amplification itself, may be a better predictor of patient survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…11 In previous studies, the frequency of FGFR2 amplification varied from 3 to 9% depending on the testing methods. 4,5,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The prevalence rates also varied between countries-7% in the United Kingdom, 5% in China, and 4% in Korea-using the same FISH test analyzed in one core laboratory. 18 Nevertheless, the frequency of FGFR2 overexpression detection by immunohistochemistry ranged from 31% up to 51%-which were considerably higher than the incidence of FGFR2 amplifica tions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deng et al [21] also described that FGFR2, HER2, EGFR and MET amplification as assessed using an SNP array were mutually exclusive events. Other reports have shown that FGFR2 amplification was found to be mutually exclusive with HER2 or HER2/MET amplifications [22,23]. In summary, although multiple proteins of RTKs were overexpressed simultaneously, gene amplification or a gain in the gene copy number of an RTK was an exclusive event.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…5 In particular, FGFR2 and MET, which encode RTKs similar to ERBB2, are considered as strong candidate targets because their amplification is associated with advanced stages, 6,7 and furthermore, the amplification of FGFR2 was preferentially found in a poorly differentiated subtype. 8,9 In preclinical studies, cells with amplified FGFR2 or MET showed overexpression of their respective proteins, and inhibitors to these receptors were shown to effectively block their downstream signal transduction and induce apoptosis. [10][11][12][13][14] At present, apart from ERBB2 targeting, approaches for targeting MET and FGFR2 are the most clinically advanced of prospective targeted therapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13][14] At present, apart from ERBB2 targeting, approaches for targeting MET and FGFR2 are the most clinically advanced of prospective targeted therapy. However, the prevalence of amplification of each of these genes, as assessed by oligonucleotide array comparative genetic hybridization, real-time PCR, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), or silver in situ hybridization is low, ie, from 2 to 5% for FGFR2, 9,10,12,14 and from 2 to 8% for MET, respectively. 6,7,14,15 Intriguingly, a recent comprehensive genome-wide analysis of copy number alterations using an single nucleotide polymorphism array 13 showed that amplification of FGFR2, EGFR, ERBB2, and MET occurred mutually exclusively and that other genes such as MYC and CCND1 were also amplified in gastric cancer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%