2015
DOI: 10.2989/20702620.2015.1077416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fibre losses during debranching and debarking ofEucalyptuspulp logs using a single-grip harvester

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the species, a threefold increase in drying rate was measured when comparing 0% debarked and 100% debarked wood (Defo and Brunette 2005;Röser et al 2011) • In-stand debarking can play a major role when considering forest health and spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus) prevention. This is especially the case for windthrow operations, as the layer between the bark and wooden body is the breeding habitat, which can be removed or destroyed by debarking the logs (Schroeder and Lindelow 2002;Thorn et al 2016;Irauschek et al 2017). The urgency for new spruce bark beetle preventative treatments is highlighted by the fact that within the Bavarian state forests, over 710,000 m 3 had to be harvested in 2017 as a result of spruce bark beetle infestations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the species, a threefold increase in drying rate was measured when comparing 0% debarked and 100% debarked wood (Defo and Brunette 2005;Röser et al 2011) • In-stand debarking can play a major role when considering forest health and spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus) prevention. This is especially the case for windthrow operations, as the layer between the bark and wooden body is the breeding habitat, which can be removed or destroyed by debarking the logs (Schroeder and Lindelow 2002;Thorn et al 2016;Irauschek et al 2017). The urgency for new spruce bark beetle preventative treatments is highlighted by the fact that within the Bavarian state forests, over 710,000 m 3 had to be harvested in 2017 as a result of spruce bark beetle infestations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the use of forest harvesters in logging, the problems exposed in the work of traditional metal feeding rollers are becoming more obvious; the main reasons are surface damage and timber damage caused by the traditional feeding in the process of mechanical harvesting. 38 Jaco et al 39 investigated the damage of eucalyptus wood essence when using the harvester, compared it with the damage caused by artificial peeling and calculated the damage of eucalyptus wood essence and the loss of economic benefits. It was found that the essential causes of these damages are small contact surface and excessive pressure between the feeding rollers and logs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%