Abstract:Further research is needed to compare the efficacy and validity of FEES versus VFSS for infants in the NICU. Furthermore, evaluating the efficacy of FEES during breastfeeding is warranted.
“…Among others, studies describing FEES in stroke and traumatic brain injury patients [ 16 – 18 ], patients with neurodegenerative (dementia, Parkinson’s disease) [ 9 , 19 , 20 ] and neuromuscular diseases (for example ALS, myasthenia gravis, myotonic dystrophy) [ 21 – 24 ] as well as head and neck cancers [ 25 – 27 ] have been published. FEES is also being increasingly applied in pediatrics [ 28 – 30 ], geriatrics, [ 31 , 32 ] and intensive-care medicine [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: The Essd Fees Accreditation Programmentioning
“…Among others, studies describing FEES in stroke and traumatic brain injury patients [ 16 – 18 ], patients with neurodegenerative (dementia, Parkinson’s disease) [ 9 , 19 , 20 ] and neuromuscular diseases (for example ALS, myasthenia gravis, myotonic dystrophy) [ 21 – 24 ] as well as head and neck cancers [ 25 – 27 ] have been published. FEES is also being increasingly applied in pediatrics [ 28 – 30 ], geriatrics, [ 31 , 32 ] and intensive-care medicine [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: The Essd Fees Accreditation Programmentioning
“…Until recently, VFSS was the only available tool to study dysphagia in preterm infants (1,2). This procedure has several disadvantages (1,19), including the use of radiation, the inability for use during breastfeeding, and the requirement that the infant must be transported to a radiology suite (7), which can be risky for sick preterm infants. The introduction of FEES, with its various advantages over VFSS, set the stage for a new era in dysphagia diagnosis in preterm infants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the infant was appropriately positioned, the FEES endoscopist passed the fiberscope trans-nasally and guided the scope through the nasal cavity into the pharynx for a high position ( 13 ) while the feeder stabilized the infants' head. No topical anesthesia or decongestant was used ( 3 , 7 ). During scope placement, the feeder kept the infant calm with a pacifier and, if required, using a 24% sucrose solution (Sweet-Ease Natural, Philips Mother and Child Care, Koninklijke Philips NV, USA) for 2 min prior to and during insertion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FEES procedure has several advantages over VFSS (7,8). The natural feeding environment is not altered with FEES, as it can be performed at the bedside within a more natural feeding environment/position, with the infants' routine feeding liquids as well as during breastfeeding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the greatest advantages of FEES are the avoidance of radiation exposure, ease of use, low ongoing cost, the ability to observe the pharyngeal and laryngeal anatomy directly, evaluate pooling secretions in the pharynx/larynx, as well as the ability to repeat the procedure as frequently as indicated. However, FEES does have some limitations, as the laryngeal elevation during swallowing causes the epiglottis to invert, which can temporarily block the view during endoscopy (white-out period), as well as possible discomfort during endoscopy (3,7). The initial cost of equipment and training necessary to perform FEES is considerable.…”
ObjectiveTo assess the risk of aspiration associated with post‐swallow residue subsites in Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) in bottle‐fed infants <1 year of age.MethodsThis is a retrospective matched‐pairs cohort study at an academic tertiary children's hospital. FEES and Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study (VFSS) trials performed within the same infant <5 days apart were paired by matching bolus consistency and bottle flow rate. Positive aspiration was defined by the “or rule” in which aspiration is positive when either FEES or VFSS within a matched pair is positive.ResultsEighty‐seven FEES‐VFSS matched pairs from 29 patients (16 males; mean [SD] age, 2.9 [2.8] months) were included. The rate of positive aspiration, as defined by the “or rule”, was 59% (51/87). In FEES, post‐swallow pyriform sinus residue was present in 16% (14/87) and anterior commissure residue 27% (31/87). Risk of positive aspiration was increased by pyriform sinus residue (odds ratio [OR] 5.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9–19.3, p < 0.01) and anterior commissure residue in FEES (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1–6.1, p = 0.03). In the neonate subgroup, <1 month of age, multivariate‐adjusted analysis showed that anterior commissure residue had better diagnostic accuracy for aspiration than in older infants (overall 70% vs. 42%, p < 0.01; sensitivity 60% vs. 10%, p < 0.01), whereas pyriform sinus residue had worse accuracy (overall 41% vs. 70%, p = 0.02; sensitivity 13% vs. 43%, p = 0.02).ConclusionThis study demonstrates that pyriform sinus and anterior commissure residue during infant FEES were associated with fivefold and twofold increased risk of aspiration, respectively.Level of Evidence3. Using a retrospective matched‐pairs cohort, this study assesses the diagnostic accuracy of post‐swallow residue in FEES for predicting aspiration. Laryngoscope, 2023
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.