2010
DOI: 10.2140/gt.2010.14.2305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fibered knots and potential counterexamples to the Property 2R and Slice-Ribbon Conjectures

Abstract: If there are any 2-component counterexamples to the Generalized Property R Conjecture, a least genus component of all such counterexamples cannot be a fibered knot. Furthermore, the monodromy of a fibered component of any such counterexample has unexpected restrictions.The simplest plausible counterexample to the Generalized Property R Conjecture could be a 2-component link containing the square knot. We characterize all two-component links that contain the square knot and which surger to # 2 (S 1 × S 2 ). We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is the mechanism underlying the endgames of [10; 4] and the examples of [12], as discussed in the Introduction. Alternatively, we can view @ˆas the S 1 -bundle over T 2 with Euler number˙1, and again see that the given diffeomorphism on this is isotopic to the identity.…”
Section: The Main Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, it is the mechanism underlying the endgames of [10; 4] and the examples of [12], as discussed in the Introduction. Alternatively, we can view @ˆas the S 1 -bundle over T 2 with Euler number˙1, and again see that the given diffeomorphism on this is isotopic to the identity.…”
Section: The Main Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(This appears in [12] in the context of Property R.) Akbulut's proof again introduces a 2-3 pair and runs the 2-handle around a torus to change m by 1. (In that case, one needs to strategically locate two circles that are unknotted in the surgered S 3 in order to find the whole torus -the author essentially did this in [10], but missed the crucial punch line!…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 These braid conjugacy class invariants are defined using the structure of the annular Khovanov-Lee complex of β S 3 as a (Z ⊕ Z)-filtered chain complex. 4 We recall here some of its relevant properties.…”
Section: The Annular Rasmussen Invariant Does Not Give New Ribbon Obsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1]). 4 In [5], dt is defined as an invariant of oriented annular links, but it is noted there that the closure of a braid comes equipped with a standard orientation that we call the braid-like orientation, see [5,Sec. 3.2], and two braid-oriented braid closures are isotopic as annular links iff they are conjugate in B.…”
Section: The Annular Rasmussen Invariant Does Not Give New Ribbon Obsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possible counterexamples mentioned in the previous paragraph were produced by Gompf-Scharlemann-Thompson [GST10], building on work of Akbulut-Kirby [AK85]. We will call this family the GST links.…”
Section: Trisecting the Gompf-scharlemann-thompson Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%