2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2019.106899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fibered aspects of Yoneda's regular span

Abstract: In this paper we start by pointing out that Yoneda's notion of a regular span S : X → A × B can be interpreted as a special kind of morphism, that we call fiberwise opfibration, in the 2-category Fib(A). We study the relationship between these notions and those of internal opfibration and two-sided fibration. This fibrational point of view makes it possible to interpret Yoneda's Classification Theorem given in his 1960 paper as the result of a canonical factorization, and to extend it to a non-symmetric situat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We cannot repeat the above argument because internal opfibrations in Fib(B) are not opfibrations in Cat. Let us recall from [2] the following definition. From Theorem 2.8 in [2] it follows that every internal opfibration in Fib(B) is a fibrewise opfibration, while the latter is exactly a morphism in Fib(B) which is an internal opfibration in Cat/B (see Propositions 2.5 and 2.7 in [2]).…”
Section: Three Factorization Systems In Catmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We cannot repeat the above argument because internal opfibrations in Fib(B) are not opfibrations in Cat. Let us recall from [2] the following definition. From Theorem 2.8 in [2] it follows that every internal opfibration in Fib(B) is a fibrewise opfibration, while the latter is exactly a morphism in Fib(B) which is an internal opfibration in Cat/B (see Propositions 2.5 and 2.7 in [2]).…”
Section: Three Factorization Systems In Catmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us recall from [2] the following definition. From Theorem 2.8 in [2] it follows that every internal opfibration in Fib(B) is a fibrewise opfibration, while the latter is exactly a morphism in Fib(B) which is an internal opfibration in Cat/B (see Propositions 2.5 and 2.7 in [2]). By Corollary 2.9 in [2], the two notions coincide in the discrete case.…”
Section: Three Factorization Systems In Catmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations