2012
DOI: 10.1177/0040517512439918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiber trapping comparison of embeddable and locatable spinning with sirofil and siro core-spinning with flute pipe air suction

Abstract: In this study, we compared fiber trapping of embeddable and locatable spinning (ELS) with that of sirofil and siro core-spinning with flute pipe air suction. Online pictorial analysis showed that the 3rd ELS was free of the visual fiber loss during the 1st ELS, 2nd ELS, sirofil, and siro core-spinning. This indicated the 3rd ELS possessed high ability of trapping staple fibers. Weight loss of different yarns proved that the 3rd ELS had a statistically higher fiber trapping capacity than 1st ELS, sirofil and si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, yarn thick places and neps even decreased after applying the short grooved surface at 15 mm for both conventional and siro-spinning, which might be due to the alleviating of losing fiber accumulation on the short grooved surface apparatus by the flute pipe air suction on the ring frame. 29 The short grooved surface holds long fibers dramatically wrapping onto the yarn stem, avoiding awful fiber-wrapping of the jet ring to cause grave mass concentration 11 and excessive twist blockage of the long contact surface to incur unexpected drawing of the spinning strand. 12 Thus, unevenness CVm results showed no serious deterioration for both conventional and siro-spinning after applying the surface.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, yarn thick places and neps even decreased after applying the short grooved surface at 15 mm for both conventional and siro-spinning, which might be due to the alleviating of losing fiber accumulation on the short grooved surface apparatus by the flute pipe air suction on the ring frame. 29 The short grooved surface holds long fibers dramatically wrapping onto the yarn stem, avoiding awful fiber-wrapping of the jet ring to cause grave mass concentration 11 and excessive twist blockage of the long contact surface to incur unexpected drawing of the spinning strand. 12 Thus, unevenness CVm results showed no serious deterioration for both conventional and siro-spinning after applying the surface.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sirofil spinning (shown in Figure 20(iii)) grew out of siro-spinning via replacing one siro-component with strong multifilaments [58]. When the left siro component is substituted by multifilaments, the staple strand on the right is twisting just in a ''left diagonal" (LDP).…”
Section: Sirofil Spinning Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…그리고 siro-core사와 siro-fil사의 구조와 직물 물성의 차이에 관한 연구 (Liu et al, 2007a;Liu et al, 2007b;Miao et al, 2010;Pourahmad & Johari, 2011a;Pourahmad & Johari, 2011b;Xia et al, 2012)도 최근까지 많이 발표되었다. 한편 구성섬유특성, pore size, 실과 직물의 구조 파라메타에 따른 직물의 열이동 관련 쾌적특성에 관한 연구 (McGregor & Naebe, 2013;Nyoni & Brook, 2006;Patil et al, 2009;Tashkandi et al, 2013;Varshney et al, 2010) (Adler & Walsh, 1984;Hiraku & Yoichiro, 1993;Hsieh, 1995;Lee, 2006;Lee & Kim, 2001;Pack, 1995) (Hiraku & Yoichiro, 1993;Hsieh, 1995;Pack, 1995 …”
Section: 서 론unclassified