2021
DOI: 10.1109/jphot.2021.3083699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiber Core-Offset Humidity Sensor Based on Graphene Oxide Characteristics

Abstract: On the basis of the photoelectric properties and hydrophilicity and multimode interference of Graphene Oxide (GO), this study proposes an all-fiber humidity sensor. Two core-offset regions are constructed with a fiber fusion splicer, and a GO film is coated on a single-mode fiber (SMF) between the core-offset regions to form a humidity-sensitive Mach-Zehnder interference structure. As the external humidity environment changes, the refractive index of the GO changes, and the light in the SMF is modulated by hum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on this estimation, statistical evaluation of these models is tabulated in Based on this comparison, it can be observed that different models are useful for different application requirements. For instance, in terms of accuracy as observed from figure 5, DBN RBM [2], CRNS [3], SMAP RF DN [19], GOFCHS [27], TDR [28], and P Band & L Band [34] models outperform other models, thus, they can be used for highly accurate moisture detection applications. Similarly, cost of deployment & computational complexity is visualized from figure 6, wherein it is observed that HPCM [6], HF RFID TFS [9], PWM [10], PMMA [15], FFCSM [16], MHPS [21], ECT [24], PQCWC [25], and HSAAA [32] require lowest deployment cost, while HPCM [6], PHS [17], ECT [24], and PQCWC [25] have lower computational complexity when compared with other models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Based on this estimation, statistical evaluation of these models is tabulated in Based on this comparison, it can be observed that different models are useful for different application requirements. For instance, in terms of accuracy as observed from figure 5, DBN RBM [2], CRNS [3], SMAP RF DN [19], GOFCHS [27], TDR [28], and P Band & L Band [34] models outperform other models, thus, they can be used for highly accurate moisture detection applications. Similarly, cost of deployment & computational complexity is visualized from figure 6, wherein it is observed that HPCM [6], HF RFID TFS [9], PWM [10], PMMA [15], FFCSM [16], MHPS [21], ECT [24], PQCWC [25], and HSAAA [32] require lowest deployment cost, while HPCM [6], PHS [17], ECT [24], and PQCWC [25] have lower computational complexity when compared with other models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…These models utilize high-speed sensors, which might be costly, but provide quicker results when compared with other sensing models. Similarly, scalability of these models is also evaluated, which indicates that CM [11] has the highest scalability, which is followed by DBN RBM [2], SMAP [18], SMAP RF DN [19], GOFCHS [27], SAR [29], SMI MODIS [30], SSMDI [33], P Band & L Band [34], and MSNs [39] models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The humidity of the outside atmosphere is measured by detecting adjustments withinside the wavelength of the sensing structure's transmission spectrum. [8].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%