1999
DOI: 10.4102/curationis.v22i1.689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

fi Procedure for Evaluating Primary Health Care Software

Abstract: ... 35% of the nurse's workload lends itself to computerisation.Managers in health care often find themselves in the difficult position of having to make decisions regarding the purchasing of software and hardware which they are not qualified to make. The aim of this paper is to support health man agers in their decision making by means of a procedure and an instrument that can be used to evaluate primary health care software. A seven step approach to the evaluation process is proposed and each step is discuss… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously reported financial concerns from physicians regarding the EMR such as high up-front cost of EMR implementation, slow and uncertain financial payoffs, and high physician time cost were not found in our study because of the centralised financial management of public primary care services in Cyprus. 12 Other important barriers, such as difficulties with technology, software deficiencies, lack of incentives, inadequate technical support, and legal concerns reported in our study as well as in other studies, may be successfully resolved in a systematic way. 6,[25][26][27][28] Several findings of our study are worth further comment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Previously reported financial concerns from physicians regarding the EMR such as high up-front cost of EMR implementation, slow and uncertain financial payoffs, and high physician time cost were not found in our study because of the centralised financial management of public primary care services in Cyprus. 12 Other important barriers, such as difficulties with technology, software deficiencies, lack of incentives, inadequate technical support, and legal concerns reported in our study as well as in other studies, may be successfully resolved in a systematic way. 6,[25][26][27][28] Several findings of our study are worth further comment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Στην µοναδική έρευνα επιπολασµού του Σ∆ που έγινε στην Κύπρο,60 διαπιστώθηκε ότι ο επιπολασµός του Σ∆ ήταν περίπου Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) και στη Θεωρία Λογικής ∆ράσης-Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) 80,81. Το µοντέλο CCM συνθέτει, σύµφωνα µε TransHis 89 λόγω της ηλεκτρονικής του διασύνδεσης (interface), του περιεχοµένου και της διαδικασίας του (process), βάσει καθορισµένων κριτηρίων ως προς την καταλληλότητα, την αποδοτικότητα και την ευκολία εφαρµογής στη γενική κλινική πράξη 90,91,92. Το TransHis χρησιµοποιήθηκε ως πρωτότυπο για τη δηµιουργία ενός συστήµατος ΗΙΦ, µε την ονοµασία Αρχεία Πρωτοβάθµιας Περίθαλψης (PCHR), µε χρήση της ∆ιεθνούς Ταξινόµησης Πρωτοβάθµιας Περίθαλψης (ICPC-2)93 , της ∆ιεθνούς Ταξινόµησης Νόσων (ICD-10)94 και του Ανατοµικού Θεραπευτικού Χηµικού συστήµατος ταξινόµησης (ATC).…”
unclassified