2020
DOI: 10.1101/gad.342956.120
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FGF signaling regulates development by processes beyond canonical pathways

Abstract: FGFs are key developmental regulators that engage a signal transduction cascade through receptor tyrosine kinases, prominently engaging ERK1/2 but also other pathways. However, it remains unknown whether all FGF activities depend on this canonical signal transduction cascade. To address this question, we generated allelic series of knockin Fgfr1 and Fgfr2 mouse strains, carrying point mutations that disrupt binding of signaling effectors, and a kinase dead allele of Fgfr2 that broadly phenocopies the null muta… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
54
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(126 reference statements)
6
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The question of whether canonical FGFR signaling pathways are required to mediate cell adhesion was addressed by comparing FGFR null mutants, FGFR mutants that uncouple activation of all major downstream signaling pathways, and mutants in which the tyrosine kinase domain is inactivated. Interestingly, the effects of FGF‐induced cell–matrix or cell–cell interactions were lost in the FGFR null mutants and in the kinase‐dead mutants, but were retained in mutants that lacked connections to the canonical downstream signaling pathways (Ray et al, 2020). These data suggest that FGF–FGFR signaling regulates cell adhesion through kinase‐dependent mechanisms that are distinct from the classical downstream signaling pathways.…”
Section: Regulation Of Fgfr Signal Transduction By Extracellular and ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question of whether canonical FGFR signaling pathways are required to mediate cell adhesion was addressed by comparing FGFR null mutants, FGFR mutants that uncouple activation of all major downstream signaling pathways, and mutants in which the tyrosine kinase domain is inactivated. Interestingly, the effects of FGF‐induced cell–matrix or cell–cell interactions were lost in the FGFR null mutants and in the kinase‐dead mutants, but were retained in mutants that lacked connections to the canonical downstream signaling pathways (Ray et al, 2020). These data suggest that FGF–FGFR signaling regulates cell adhesion through kinase‐dependent mechanisms that are distinct from the classical downstream signaling pathways.…”
Section: Regulation Of Fgfr Signal Transduction By Extracellular and ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigation of the downstream targets of FGFR2 activation confirmed our assessment that the effects of the Fgfr2c C342Y mutation are cell type specific. ERK1/2 is the main effector of FGF signaling ( Brewer et al, 2016 ; Ray et al, 2020 ). ERK pathway promotes osteoblast differentiation and bone formation in vitro and in vivo ( Xiao et al, 2000 ; Xiao et al, 2002 ; Kim et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another candidate for regulation by FGF-signaling is BIM. Deletion of one Bim allele, which encodes an apoptosis initiator that directly activates BAK/BAX [36, 37], will partially rescue aberrant cell death that underlie craniofacial defects that are due to the loss of Fgfr1 and Fgfr2 [29]. Our model for genetically rescuing cell death in the Fgf8 mutant kidney presents a future opportunity to explore the role of FGFs in pro-survival signaling in vivo .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%