2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2016.7841841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FFT-Based Trellis Receiver for SEFDM Signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[19] [20] Proposed scheme Timing synchronization Carrier recovery Sampling frequency synchronization Phase recovery Detector tion (TSVD) was utilized to handle the subcarrier correlation matrix, which improves the detection performance obviously [13].To further enhance the performance of FSD detector, the TSVD-FSD detector was proposed, which applies the estimation of TSVD detector as the initialization of FSD detector [14]. Subsequently, several improved detectors, such as ID-FSD detector [15], [16], trellis detector [17], and factor graph-based iterative detector [18], were proposed to improve detection performance. Nevertheless, the above SEFDM detectors highly relies on a perfect synchronization, which is hard to realize in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19] [20] Proposed scheme Timing synchronization Carrier recovery Sampling frequency synchronization Phase recovery Detector tion (TSVD) was utilized to handle the subcarrier correlation matrix, which improves the detection performance obviously [13].To further enhance the performance of FSD detector, the TSVD-FSD detector was proposed, which applies the estimation of TSVD detector as the initialization of FSD detector [14]. Subsequently, several improved detectors, such as ID-FSD detector [15], [16], trellis detector [17], and factor graph-based iterative detector [18], were proposed to improve detection performance. Nevertheless, the above SEFDM detectors highly relies on a perfect synchronization, which is hard to realize in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time–frequency domain filters, such as FDSS [ 20 ], prototype filters, and shaping filters, can effectively improve the performance of the waveform by changing the time–frequency domain characteristics, and can be flexibly designed for specific sensing or communication properties. For example, the schemes of pruned DFT-spread filter bank multicarrier (FBMC) [ 21 , 22 ], FFT-based spectrally efficient frequency-division multiplexing (SEFDM) [ 23 , 24 ], and more compact faster-than-Nyquist (FTN) signals [ 25 ] have different tradeoffs between PAPR, BER, and spectrum efficiency (SE). Frequency-domain spectral shaping on DFT-s-OFDM for SE and PAPR performance has been proposed [ 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Huang et al [7] achieved rates of up to 20 Gb/s in optical SEFDM using a cascaded binaryphase-shift-keying iterative detection (CBID) algorithm in conjunction with a fixed sphere decoder (FSD). At the same time, Rashich et al [8] designed an FFT-based Trellis Receiver to recover SEFDM signals having hundreds of subcarriers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%