2019
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.26138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FFParam: Standalone package for CHARMM additive and Drude polarizable force field parametrization of small molecules

Abstract: Accurate force‐field (FF) parameters are key to reliable prediction of properties obtained from molecular modeling (MM) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. With ever‐widening applicability of MD simulations, robust parameters need to be generated for a wider range of chemical species. The CHARMM General Force Field program (CGenFF, https://cgenff.umaryland.edu/) is a tool for obtaining initial parameters for a given small molecule based on analogy with the available CGenFF parameters. However, improvement… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LibDock module used a grid placed in the binding site and used polar and non-polar probes to calculate protein hot spots, then further used hot spots to arrange the ligands to form favorable interactions. Moreover, the study also used the Smart Minimiser algorithm and the CHARMm force field (Cambridge, MA, USA) to minimize the ligands ( 27 ). Then, all ligands’ positions were adjusted and ranked according to the calculated ligand scores.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LibDock module used a grid placed in the binding site and used polar and non-polar probes to calculate protein hot spots, then further used hot spots to arrange the ligands to form favorable interactions. Moreover, the study also used the Smart Minimiser algorithm and the CHARMm force field (Cambridge, MA, USA) to minimize the ligands ( 27 ). Then, all ligands’ positions were adjusted and ranked according to the calculated ligand scores.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such quantum mechanically detailed computation is prohibitively expensive for any realistic complex molecular systems. Molecular interactions are traditionally represented by explicit functions and pairwise approximations as exemplified by typical physics based atomistic molecular mechanical (MM) force fields (FFs) [ 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ]: or knowledge based potential functions [ 48 , 49 , 50 ]: these simple functions, while being amenable to rapid computation and are physically sound grounded near local energy minima (e.g., harmonic behavior of bonding, bending near equilibrium bond lengths and bend angles), are potentially problematic for anharmonic interactions, which are very common in some molecular systems [ 51 ]. It is well understood that properly parameterized Lennard–Jones potentials are accurate only near the bottom of its potential well.…”
Section: Challenges In Molecular Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such quantum mechanically detailed computation is prohibitively expensive for any realistic complex molecular systems. Molecular interactions are traditionally represented by explicit functions and pairwise approximations as exemplified by typical physics based atomistic molecular mechanical (MM) force fields (FFs) [44][45][46][47]:…”
Section: Accurate Description Of Molecular Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in strong contrast to decades of trade-off in molecular simulation that improved efficiency being always accompanied more or less by reduced accuracy, and increased efficiency being always accompanied by more or less reduction of accuracy! When compared with conventional molecular mechanical force fields [30][31][32][33] or knowledge based potentials, [34][35][36] the ability of accounting for many-body correlations is another advantage of LFEL that is likely to contribute to improved accuracy. It is important to note that many neural network based force fields (NNFF) methodologies have been developed up to date.…”
Section: Repetitive Local Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%