2022
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2022.3171257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Few-Shot Object Detection via Context-Aware Aggregation for Remote Sensing Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) NWPU VHR-10: This experiment is conducted on the Faster R-CNN [41] RepMet [31] FeatReweighting [30] TFA [27] Meta R-CNN [29] P-CNN [37] CAAN [40] Ours Faster R-CNN [41] RepMet [31] FeatReweighting [30] TFA [27] Meta R-CNN [29] P-CNN [37] CAAN [40] Ours…”
Section: Experimental Results 1) Diormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…2) NWPU VHR-10: This experiment is conducted on the Faster R-CNN [41] RepMet [31] FeatReweighting [30] TFA [27] Meta R-CNN [29] P-CNN [37] CAAN [40] Ours Faster R-CNN [41] RepMet [31] FeatReweighting [30] TFA [27] Meta R-CNN [29] P-CNN [37] CAAN [40] Ours…”
Section: Experimental Results 1) Diormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Split 1 to Split 4, the method is compared with one object detection approach (Faster R-CNN [41]), four natural-images-based classical FSOD algorithms (RepMet [31], FeatReweighting [30], TFA [27], and Meta R-CNN [29]), and two novel RSIs-based FSOD methods (P-CNN [37] and CAAN [40]). CAAN achieves the best performance in Split 1 and Split 3 at three different shots, while P-CNN shows the state-of-the-art results under other situations.…”
Section: B Comparing Methods 1) Diormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations