2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Few-shot activity learning by dual Markov logic networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These algorithms can generalize some unseen data giving only a few labeled training examples to the network. The learning to learn approach, which includes meta training 9,10,22 was introduced to make the FSL algorithm an effective domain. It divides the problem into two parts one is the base level in which standard supervised learning is performed, another part is the meta-level that extracts the information from the base level.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These algorithms can generalize some unseen data giving only a few labeled training examples to the network. The learning to learn approach, which includes meta training 9,10,22 was introduced to make the FSL algorithm an effective domain. It divides the problem into two parts one is the base level in which standard supervised learning is performed, another part is the meta-level that extracts the information from the base level.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of using the FSL technique is that a network with a small set of labeled images is possible to train in less time while in many machine learning methods, a huge amount of data and time are required to train a network so that it can accurately predict. These days many approaches are used for FSL like learning to learn which includes meta training, [9][10][11] gradient-based approaches, 12,13 matric-based approaches, 14,15 and transductive learning. 16,17 Matric-based approaches have shown much more improvements as compared to the traditional meta-learning and matching algorithms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%