Few Effects of a 5-Week Adaptive Computerized Cognitive Training Program in Healthy Older Adults

Abstract

Computerized cognitive training programs are becoming increasingly popular and practical for cognitive aging. Nevertheless, basic questions remain about the benefits of such programs, and about the degree to which participant expectations might influence training and transfer. Here we examined a commercial cognitive training program (Activate) in a 5-week double-blind, pseudo-randomized placebo-controlled trial. Based on a priori power analysis, we recruited 99 healthy older adults 59-91 years of age (M = 68.87, SD = 6.31; 69 women), assigning them to either the intervention or an active control program (Sudoku and n-back working memory exercises). We subdivided both groups into high and low expectation priming conditions, to probe for effects of participants' expectations on training and transfer. We assessed transfer using a battery of standard neuropsychological and psychosocial measures that had been agreed to by the training program developers. We planned and pre-registered our analyses (on osf.io). The majority (88%) of participants progressed through the training, and most provided positive feedback about it. Similarly, the majority (80%) of participants believed they were truly training their brains. Yet, transfer of training was minimal. Also minimal were any effects of expectations on training and transfer, although participants who received high expectation priming tended to engage more with their assigned program overall. Our findings suggest limited benefits of Activate training on cognition and psychosocial wellbeing in healthy older adults, at least under the conditions we used.

Effects of Cognitive Training in Mild Cognitive Impairmentmeasured by Resting State Functional Imaging

“…Although this controversy exists, computerized cognitive training (CCT) programs have been increasingly used to improve cognitive functions [ 11 , 12 ]. CCT programs involve structured practice tasks and have proved to be effective in improving cognitive abilities such as language, visuo-spatial memory, and attention skills [ 13 , 14 ].…”

Assessing the Impact of Expectations in Cognitive Training and Beyond

“…As of today, we identified only three that did actually manipulate expectations in the context of such a cognitive training intervention. Rabipour et al (2019) In this study, prior to training, participants were presented with a prerecorded narrated presentation outlining the expected outcomes of the study. These expectations could be either positive (e.g., that visual N-back training would result in significant improvement not just in the visual N-back task but other tasks as well) or negative (e.g., that visual N-back training would result in significant improvement on just the visual N-back task, but not any other tasks).…”

Strengthening Mental Abilities with Relational Training (SMART) in Multiple Sclerosis (MS): Study Protocol for a Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial

“…Participants in this arm will receive treatment-as-usual (TAU) plus a control (sham) cognitive training intervention: Sudoku. We selected Sudoku to control for expectancy effects based on popular conceptions that it broadly improves cognitive functions (19,29) , coupled with little evidence supporting this notion (30) , and its use as an active control in similar trials (31) . Sham-training will be delivered online, over the same timeframe/regimen as SMART treatment, and with telephone support to facilitate access -controlling for modality, schedule of engagement, and relational support.…”