2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-022-02363-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Few Differences in Sexual Talk by Gender/Sex and Dyad Type: A Retrospective and Daily Diary Study with Couples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, only 3 of the 5 same-sex couples recruited for the study were able to be included in our analyses due to missing data. Although recent literature has begun to explore sexual communication processes more in same-sex and LGBTQ+ individuals finding little differences across relationship types (Holmberg & Blair, 2009; Merwin et al, 2022; Rubinsky & Hosek, 2020), due to the small sample size, we cannot determine the extent to which the findings are completely generalizable to all same-sex couples. Future studies should include more LGBTQ+ couples to continue to understand sexual communication processes and quality in LGBTQ+ relationships and its association with sexual satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Additionally, only 3 of the 5 same-sex couples recruited for the study were able to be included in our analyses due to missing data. Although recent literature has begun to explore sexual communication processes more in same-sex and LGBTQ+ individuals finding little differences across relationship types (Holmberg & Blair, 2009; Merwin et al, 2022; Rubinsky & Hosek, 2020), due to the small sample size, we cannot determine the extent to which the findings are completely generalizable to all same-sex couples. Future studies should include more LGBTQ+ couples to continue to understand sexual communication processes and quality in LGBTQ+ relationships and its association with sexual satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%