Feto-maternal outcomes in women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus according to the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria

Nayak, Prasant; Mitra, Subarna; Sahoo, Jaya Prakash; Daniel, Mary; Mathew, Agnes; Padma, Alaganandam

doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2013.10.017

Cited by 41 publications

(41 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Seven studies using the IADPSG criteria reported the percent of GDM cases diagnosed by the fasting plasma glucose criterion alone (fasting glucose > 92 g/dL), which ranged from 24.8 to 94%, with a median of 70% (see Appendix S8) [13, 25, 26, 31, 38, 49, 54]. …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Naik

Alexander

et al. 2018

Acta Diabetol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims Although diabetes is rapidly increasing in India, there is no national consensus on best practices for screening, diagnosis, and management of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The goal of this study was to systematically review the literature for studies reporting the prevalence and screening and diagnostic methods for gestational diabetes in India. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and POPLINE for studies on screening for GDM in India. We included English-language full reports and conference abstracts of cross-sectional studies, prospective, and retrospective cohorts that reported the screening method and prevalence of GDM. We performed descriptive analysis on all studies and meta-analysis, meta-regression, and subgroup meta-analysis on studies with medium or low risk of bias. Results We included 64 studies reporting 90 prevalence estimates. Prevalence estimates ranged from 0 to 41.9%. Subset meta-analyses showed that the IADPSG diagnostic criteria found significantly more GDM cases (prevalence = 19.19% [15.5, 23.6], p < 0.05) than the WHO 1999 criteria (10.13% [8.17, 12.50]) and DIPSI criteria (7.37% [5.2, 10.16]). Studies that compared the IADPSG and WHO 1999 criteria showed poor positive agreement (33–79%). Studies specifying time of GDM diagnosis showed that patients (11–60%) develop GDM as early as the first trimester, but many GDM cases (16–40%) are missed if screened only at first visit. Conclusions In India, prevalence estimates of GDM vary substantially by diagnostic criteria. When evaluating screening and diagnostic criteria for GDM, providers should consider their patients' needs and correlate screening criteria with pregnancy outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Naik

Alexander

et al. 2018

Acta Diabetol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…24,25 Whether in the latter studies the absence of differences in these two groups was the result of effectiveness of treatment or a lack of difference in prevalence of adverse outcomes independent of treatment cannot be inferred as a result of the lack of an untreated IADPSG GDM control group.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Using The International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Criteria

Sacks

Black

et al. 2015

Obstetrics & Gynecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In spite of the use of this one-step approach in many prospective studies [18][19][20][21] and support of it by several societies, variation in the used protocol between countries even between different centers within countries is existed [22]. The American Diabetes Association advised to continue with the IADPSG recommendation, while the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist recommended the twostep approach [23,24].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gestational diabetes mellitus in an Iranian pregnant population using IADPSG criteria: Incidence, contributing factors and outcomes

Shahbazian

Nouhjah

Jahanfar

et al. 2016

Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Revi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Feto-maternal outcomes in women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus according to the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria

Cited by 41 publications

References 20 publications

Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Using The International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Criteria

Gestational diabetes mellitus in an Iranian pregnant population using IADPSG criteria: Incidence, contributing factors and outcomes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About