2006
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FETI-DP, BDDC, and block Cholesky methods

Abstract: Two popular non-overlapping domain decomposition methods, the FETI-DP and BDDC algorithms, are reformulated using Block Cholesky factorizations, an approach which can provide a useful framework for the design of domain decomposition algorithms for solving symmetric positive definite linear system of equations. Instead of introducing Lagrange multipliers to enforce the coarse level, primal continuity constraints in these algorithms, a change of variables is used such that each primal constraint corresponds to a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
195
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
195
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Background information and related theory for BDDC can be found in several references including [2,9,10,8,1]. Let u i and u denote vectors of finite element coefficients associated with Γ i and Γ .…”
Section: Bddcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Background information and related theory for BDDC can be found in several references including [2,9,10,8,1]. Let u i and u denote vectors of finite element coefficients associated with Γ i and Γ .…”
Section: Bddcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the generalization of the results of Sections 3 and 4 to three dimensions is straightforward, and the results in Section 5 have been generalized [5] to three dimensions (wire-basket algorithm [9]) and Neumann-Neumann algorithms [12]. Since the balancing domain decomposition by constraint (BDDC) method has the same condition number as the FETI-DP method [17,15], the sharpness of the condition number estimate for BDDC [16] also follows from Theorem 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These basis functions correspond to the primal interface velocity continuity constraints. We will always assume that the basis has been changed so that each primal basis function corresponds to an explicit degree of freedom which is shared by the neighboring subdomains; see [7], [5,Section 6], and [4] for more details of the change of basis. The complimentary space W ∆ is the direct sum of the subdomain dual interface velocity spaces W (i) ∆ , which correspond to the remaining interface velocity degrees of freedom and are spanned by basis functions which vanish at the primal degrees of freedom.…”
Section: A Bddc Preconditioner For Stokes Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compute the product of S −1 and a vector, a coarse level saddle point problem, for the primal variables, and subdomain Neumann problems, each with a few primal constraints, need to be solved; cf. [7,8].…”
Section: A Bddc Preconditioner For Stokes Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation