2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fetal phonocardiography—Past and future possibilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
33
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
33
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common trigger is stressful situations (typically the MR scanner's tunnel environment), which causes an anxiety alarm reaction of the organism. [1][2] The basic method of predicting hyperventilation states in MR testing today is the use of costly devices. These devices monitor breathing rate, pulse rate or both parameters at the same time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common trigger is stressful situations (typically the MR scanner's tunnel environment), which causes an anxiety alarm reaction of the organism. [1][2] The basic method of predicting hyperventilation states in MR testing today is the use of costly devices. These devices monitor breathing rate, pulse rate or both parameters at the same time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other promising methods are fetal phonography (fPCG) [7,8,9] and fetal magnetocardiography (fMCG) [10,11,12]. While fECG is based on recording the electrical activity of the fetal heart, fPCG deals with recording its mechanical (acoustical) activity, and the fMCG is a method that registers the associated magnetic fields of the fetal heart produced as a consequence of its electrical activity [8,9,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fiber-optic measurement sensors are resistant to technical artifacts such as electromagnetic interferences; therefore, they can be used in situations where it is impossible to deploy conventional EFM methods, such as during Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) examination [20,21] or in wet environments. The literature shows that this sensor is demonstrably more sensitive [22,23,24,25,26] than the currently used electret microphones [27] (acoustic sensor [28,29]). These properties make fiber-optic sensors very convenient and suitable choices for the measurement of desirable (fPCG) signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%