2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01521.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fetal nuchal translucency thickness in different cut‐off points for aneuploidy screening in the south of Vietnam

Abstract: Aims: The purpose of this study was to define the most suitable cut-off point for fetal nuchal translucency thickness in a screening program for aneuploidy and trisomy 21 in the south of Vietnam. Material & Methods: Two thousand and five hundred cases of singleton pregnancies were followed prospectively from the first trimester to the delivery. The rate of aneuploidy was calculated by seeking a relationship to increased fetal nuchal translucency thickness then calculating the sensitivity and specificity of dif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority (98.4%) of paired data were submitted to the NTQR program by the laboratories performing the analyte assessment. Therefore, if a patient chose not to undergo combined first-trimester screening after the first-trimester ultrasound examination, for example, in case of markedly increased NT or structural anomaly, their data were not included, as those with NT ≥ 3 mm or with fetal abnormalities visualized were probably counseled on alternative testing strategies [21][22][23] . It is therefore likely that the data presented here represent those that were in the more 'normal' range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority (98.4%) of paired data were submitted to the NTQR program by the laboratories performing the analyte assessment. Therefore, if a patient chose not to undergo combined first-trimester screening after the first-trimester ultrasound examination, for example, in case of markedly increased NT or structural anomaly, their data were not included, as those with NT ≥ 3 mm or with fetal abnormalities visualized were probably counseled on alternative testing strategies [21][22][23] . It is therefore likely that the data presented here represent those that were in the more 'normal' range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%