Fetal MRI radiomics: non-invasive and reproducible quantification of human lung maturity

Abstract

Objectives To assess the reproducibility of radiomics features extracted from the developing lung in repeated in-vivo fetal MRI acquisitions. Methods In-vivo MRI (1.5 Tesla) scans of 30 fetuses, each including two axial and one coronal T2-weighted sequences of the whole lung with all other acquisition parameters kept constant, were retrospectively identified. Manual segmentation of the lungs was performed using ITK-Snap. One hundred radiomics features were extracted from fetal lung MRI data using Pyradiomics, resulting in 90 datasets. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) of radiomics features were calculated between baseline and repeat axial acquisitions and between baseline axial and coronal acquisitions. Results MRI data of 30 fetuses (12 [40%] females, 18 [60%] males) at a median gestational age of 24 + 5 gestational weeks plus days (GW) (interquartile range [IQR] 3 + 3 GW, range 21 + 1 to 32 + 6 GW) were included. Median ICC of radiomics features between baseline and repeat axial MR acquisitions was 0.92 (IQR 0.13, range 0.33 to 1), with 60 features exhibiting excellent (ICC > 0.9), 27 good (> 0.75–0.9), twelve moderate (0.5–0.75), and one poor (ICC < 0.5) reproducibility. Median ICC of radiomics features between baseline axial and coronal MR acquisitions was 0.79 (IQR 0.15, range 0.2 to 1), with 20 features exhibiting excellent, 47 good, 29 moderate, and four poor reproducibility. Conclusion Standardized in-vivo fetal MRI allows reproducible extraction of lung radiomics features. In the future, radiomics analysis may improve diagnostic and prognostic yield of fetal MRI in normal and pathologic lung development. Key Points • Non-invasive fetal MRI acquired using a standardized protocol allows reproducible extraction of radiomics features from the developing lung for objective tissue characterization. • Alteration of imaging plane between fetal MRI acquisitions has a negative impact on lung radiomics feature reproducibility. • Fetal MRI radiomics features reflecting the microstructure and shape of the fetal lung could complement observed-to-expected lung volume in the prediction of postnatal outcome and optimal treatment of fetuses with abnormal lung development in the future.

Evolving the Era of 5D Ultrasound? A Systematic Literature Review on the Applications for Artificial Intelligence Ultrasound Imaging in Obstetrics and Gynecology

“…In contrast with that, gynecological disorders such as different cancer entities and pelvis-related diseases benefit from other imaging methods such as MRI or CT. In the current literature, not only US, but also MRI applications profit from AI assistance, for example in fetal lung texture analysis [228,229] or cervical cancer diagnosis [230]. In the following, the benefits and limitations of AI application in OB/GYN US imaging are summarized.…”

Radiomics-Assisted Computed Tomography-Based Analysis to Evaluate Lung Morphology Characteristics after Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

“…The overwhelming majority of published radiomics studies focus on oncologic pathology [34]. So far, the application of radiomics in pediatric radiology is rare, generally CT and MRI being the main modalities of examination [34], observing subjects such as cancer [35][36][37], pneumonia analysis [38], or prenatal diagnostics [39]. Up to this point, radiomics has proven its usefulness in a number of studies of the respiratory system, some examples being the ability to distinguish COVID-19 from other non-COVID-19 pneumonias [40,41], attempts to diagnose idiopathic lung fibrosis [42], quantifying the risk for lung cancer [43], or the diagnosis and evaluation of severity and prognosis in COPD patients [44,45].…”

Reproducibility of 2D versus 3D radiomics for quantitative assessment of fetal lung development: a retrospective fetal MRI study

“…The requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. A part of the study cohort ( n = 29) has been previously reported in a study that did not include 2D radiomics feature analyses [ 12 ].…”