1972
DOI: 10.1097/00132586-197202010-00039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FETAL HEART RATE AND pH OF FETAL CAPILLARY BLOOD DURING EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN LABOR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the same lidocaine dose schedule without added epinephrine was tried, the analgesia was often inadequate, maternal and neonatal blood lidocaine levels higher, and the risk of accumulation more evident. It was observed that the mean duration of labour among primiparous women was significantly longer in cases receiving epidural blocks than in a randomly selected group of control patients who had not received regional anaesthesia.Changes in foetal heart rate patterns, decrease in foetal pH, and metabolic acidosis in the neonatal period have been described in connection with lumbar epidural anaesthesia (6,13,19,26). A reduction of the normal beat to beat variations in foetal heart rate recordings which is sometimes observed during epidural anaesthesia has been suggested to be caused by the administered local anaesthetic drug and not by asphyxia (2).In the present publication the influence of the epidural anaesthesia on uterine activity, on foetal heart rate pattern, and on the acid-base status of the foetus, and on the neonates at birth, will be reviewed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the same lidocaine dose schedule without added epinephrine was tried, the analgesia was often inadequate, maternal and neonatal blood lidocaine levels higher, and the risk of accumulation more evident. It was observed that the mean duration of labour among primiparous women was significantly longer in cases receiving epidural blocks than in a randomly selected group of control patients who had not received regional anaesthesia.Changes in foetal heart rate patterns, decrease in foetal pH, and metabolic acidosis in the neonatal period have been described in connection with lumbar epidural anaesthesia (6,13,19,26). A reduction of the normal beat to beat variations in foetal heart rate recordings which is sometimes observed during epidural anaesthesia has been suggested to be caused by the administered local anaesthetic drug and not by asphyxia (2).In the present publication the influence of the epidural anaesthesia on uterine activity, on foetal heart rate pattern, and on the acid-base status of the foetus, and on the neonates at birth, will be reviewed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fall in maternal blood pressure (as occurring in th e vaso-vagal refl ex) is known t o res ult in fetal bradycardia (5) . The ma te rna l va o-vagal refl ex is by its na ture a hort self-limiting occurrence a nd may cause tra ns ie nt s igns of fetal di s tress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bradycardia and late deceleration patterns have also been observed with increased frequency during epidural anaesthesia (26). It was previously believed that such changes were the sequela of maternal hypotension caused by the anaesthesia.…”
Section: Cord Bloodmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…When the same lidocaine dose schedule without added epinephrine was tried, the analgesia was often inadequate, maternal and neonatal blood lidocaine levels higher, and the risk of accumulation more evident. It was observed that the mean duration of labour among primiparous women was significantly longer in cases receiving epidural blocks than in a randomly selected group of control patients who had not received regional anaesthesia.Changes in foetal heart rate patterns, decrease in foetal pH, and metabolic acidosis in the neonatal period have been described in connection with lumbar epidural anaesthesia (6,13,19,26). A reduction of the normal beat to beat variations in foetal heart rate recordings which is sometimes observed during epidural anaesthesia has been suggested to be caused by the administered local anaesthetic drug and not by asphyxia (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation