2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.04.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fetal Growth Restriction in Preterm Infants and Cardiovascular Function at Five Years of Age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
41
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are similar those reported in a smaller cohort of 5‐year‐old children 25. Many participants suffered from postnatal growth restriction in infancy, and this has been explained by suboptimal neonatal nutrition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our findings are similar those reported in a smaller cohort of 5‐year‐old children 25. Many participants suffered from postnatal growth restriction in infancy, and this has been explained by suboptimal neonatal nutrition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Baseline echocardiographic results were similar to those in previously published studies [14,15] which revealed smaller heart (LV, RV and LA) dimensions in the group of ELBW children than in the control group. After expressing the results as z-scores for BSA, statistically significant differences were observed for diastolic diameters of both ventricles and the volume of the left one.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…36,37 To our knowledge, however, very few studies have evaluated the cardiac repercussions of preterm birth itself. Mikkola et al 38 reported increased interventricular septum thickness and decreased LV end-diastolic diameter in 5-year-olds born at 28 weeks of gestation as compared with values of a reference population. Thus, current data corroborate clinical and epidemiological data suggesting that neonatal high O 2 exposure in an immature individual could be a risk factor for cardiac disease at adult age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%