2021
DOI: 10.2174/1573404816999200821162312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fetal Distress Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Network

Abstract: Objective: Our study aims is to provide an improvised model that classifies the fetal distress using a two-dimensional Convolution neural network (CNN). It also helps in improving the visualization of FHR and UC signals. Background: Hypoxia or Fetal Distress is the main cause of death in the newborns. Cardiotocography is used to detect hypoxia in which fetal heart rate and uterine contraction signals are observed. Setting: Department of Computer Engineering and Technology, Guru Nanak Dev University, India.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To illustrate the importance of our model, the outcomes of both machine learning ( Comert et al, 2018 ; O’Sullivan et al, 2021 ; Ben Barek et al, 2023 ) and deep learning approaches ( Liu et al, 2021 ; Singh et al, 2021 ) utilizing the identical dataset are presented in Table 3 . Our model exhibits superior performance in terms of ACC, SP, PR, recall, and AUC compared to the aforementioned machine learning methods ( Liu et al, 2021 ; Singh et al, 2021 ). Furthermore, when compared to a specific model ( Liu et al, 2021 ), our model demonstrates notably higher levels of ACC, SP, and recall.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To illustrate the importance of our model, the outcomes of both machine learning ( Comert et al, 2018 ; O’Sullivan et al, 2021 ; Ben Barek et al, 2023 ) and deep learning approaches ( Liu et al, 2021 ; Singh et al, 2021 ) utilizing the identical dataset are presented in Table 3 . Our model exhibits superior performance in terms of ACC, SP, PR, recall, and AUC compared to the aforementioned machine learning methods ( Liu et al, 2021 ; Singh et al, 2021 ). Furthermore, when compared to a specific model ( Liu et al, 2021 ), our model demonstrates notably higher levels of ACC, SP, and recall.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, when compared to a specific model ( Liu et al, 2021 ), our model demonstrates notably higher levels of ACC, SP, and recall. It is worth noting that the model discussed ( Singh et al, 2021 ) achieves an ACC of 69.6%, potentially attributed to the limitations of CNNs in capturing temporal features effectively. This observation suggests that our model possesses enhanced classification capabilities.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four umbilical artery pH cutoffs are used to categorize fetuses as acidemic or non-academic: 7.05, 7.10, 7.15, and 7.20 ( Castro et al, 2021 ). The pH value of 7.15 is determined as the threshold value in this paper after extensive research ( Sholapurkar, 2020 ) ( Singh et al, 2021 ). Blood with a pH of less than 7.15 is regarded as hypoxia, whereas blood with a pH of more than 7.15 is considered normal.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%