1988
DOI: 10.1002/pd.1970080412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fetal curarization for prenatal magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract: Fetal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was performed at 33 weeks of gestation for investigation of a posterior fossa abnormality found at ultrasound screening. Fetal movements were abolished by vecuronium injected under ultrasound guidance into the umbilical vein. MR images showed atrophy of the left cerebellar lobe with cisternal dilatation. These were confirmed postnatally by CT scan.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with earlier reports [16,18,20], the increased size of the brain and reduced fetal motion in the third trimester enhanced the use of MRI. Adequate sedation was achieved using intramuscular morphine sulfate, although several investigators have used intravenous diazepam [20] or fetal neuromuscular blockade with curare [4,6] or pancuronium bromide [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with earlier reports [16,18,20], the increased size of the brain and reduced fetal motion in the third trimester enhanced the use of MRI. Adequate sedation was achieved using intramuscular morphine sulfate, although several investigators have used intravenous diazepam [20] or fetal neuromuscular blockade with curare [4,6] or pancuronium bromide [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A phased-array surface coil should be used. Some authors suggest using a premedication to sedate the fetus thus reducing fetal movements [10,11]; however, we are convinced that premedication is not required any longer in the day and age of fast, single-shot MR imaging. In our experience, sedation has never been necessary to obtain optimal images.…”
Section: Technical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Until recently, the long acquisition times required for this investigation were not conductive to foetal imaging because foetal movements resulted in poor quality images. Obtaining adequate images with the traditional spin-echo technniques required foetal sedation or paralysis (Daffos et al, 1988). Within the development of ultrafast scanning techniques, the artifacts caused by foetal motion have almost been eliminated (Hubbard et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%