2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2204.09573
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fetal Brain Tissue Annotation and Segmentation Challenge Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We studied the automatic segmentation of fetal brain 3D MRIs into seven tissue types and brain extraction 45 . Fetal brain 3D MRIs from the FeTA dataset 23 , 25 were used for the evaluation. More details about the dataset used for the evaluation can be found in section Fetal brain 3D MRI used for the evaluation of automatic segmentation .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We studied the automatic segmentation of fetal brain 3D MRIs into seven tissue types and brain extraction 45 . Fetal brain 3D MRIs from the FeTA dataset 23 , 25 were used for the evaluation. More details about the dataset used for the evaluation can be found in section Fetal brain 3D MRI used for the evaluation of automatic segmentation .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the evaluation of automatic fetal brain segmentation we have used the publicly available FeTA dataset 23 , 25 (first and second release).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optimal solution would require further training on large abnormal cohorts (e.g., similarly to Fidon et al (2021b) ) along with possible introduction of classification step and optimisation of the network architecture and parcellation protocol. Notably, the best reported performances in terms of average Dice from the FETA segmentation challenge Payette et al (2022) vary within 0.78-0.79 range (vs. 0.87-0.90 for BOUNTI performance540 Tab. 2), which highlights the advantages of using high quality consistent ground truth labels for training.…”
Section: Impact Of Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These limitations are (i) low contrast caused by the narrow task-dependent distribution range of regions of interest (ROIs), (ii) the network representation preferences caused by the distribution variation inter images, low contrast, and unclear boundaries between soft tissues. The deep learning models has been widely used in segmentation of medical images [5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%