2021
DOI: 10.1002/pd.6061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fetal and neonatal brain lesions following laser ablation for twin‐to‐twin‐transfusion‐syndrome as detected by pre‐ and post‐natal brain imaging

Abstract: Objective To determine the rate of and risk factors for fetal and neonatal brain lesions following laser ablation for twin‐to‐twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). Methods A retrospective cohort study of 83 women with monochorionic twin pregnancies who underwent ablation for TTTS at a single tertiary hospital. Post‐laser survivors were followed‐up with fetal neurosonogram every 2 weeks and fetal brain MRI at 28–32 weeks of gestation; post‐natal brain imaging included neurosonogram. Cases with pre‐ and post‐natal b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(60 reference statements)
1
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike our study which showed no statistically significant differences in brain lesions detected on postnatal brain imaging between no post‐laser TAPS and post‐laser TAPS, a study by Stirnemann et al 32 . and Hochberg et al 33 . showed post‐laser TAPS to be a significant risk factor for brain lesions when compared to pregnancies with no detected brain lesions on imaging.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike our study which showed no statistically significant differences in brain lesions detected on postnatal brain imaging between no post‐laser TAPS and post‐laser TAPS, a study by Stirnemann et al 32 . and Hochberg et al 33 . showed post‐laser TAPS to be a significant risk factor for brain lesions when compared to pregnancies with no detected brain lesions on imaging.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, incidence of these outcomes varied widely among studies (ranging between 0% and 25% for severe cerebral injury), 5,7,12,30,31 mostly related to their small sample size and heterogenicity in the management options, with no specific predominance being shown among donors or recipients. Unlike our study which showed no statistically significant differences in brain lesions detected on postnatal brain imaging between no post-laser TAPS and post-laser TAPS, a study by Stirnemann et al 32 and Hochberg et al 33 showed post-laser TAPS to be a significant risk factor for brain lesions when compared to pregnancies with no detected brain lesions on imaging. This afterward.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporation of prenatal MR brain imaging proved beneficial allowing important additional diagnosis of injuries undetected by neurosonogram scans performed by experienced specialists. In line with the findings of the current study, we and others have previously reported that post‐laser TAPS is a risk factor for fetal brain injury in survivors of laser ablation for TTTS 19,20 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In line with the findings of the current study, we and others have previously reported that post-laser TAPS is a risk factor for fetal brain injury in survivors of laser ablation for TTTS. 19,20 In our study, we were not able to identify specific risk factors subjecting TAPS fetuses to pre-or post-natal brain injury findings.…”
Section: Variablementioning
confidence: 59%
“…Inconsistency in the definition of abnormal imaging findings such as mild ventriculomegaly or nonconclusive MR imaging findings such as suspected subependymal blood products are another reason for the incidence variability. 20 Early fbMRI, performed acutely (,2 weeks) following sIUFD or when postprocedural complications are noted, might also increase the sensitivity for diagnosing acute ischemia or hemorrhage, especially when DWI is performed. 19 Early ischemic or hemorrhagic findings may spontaneously resolve and may not be detected later in pregnancy and at the time of third trimester follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%