Fetal and Maternal Outcomes Following Cesarean Hysterectomy

Hoffman, Mallory; Hallett-Voss, Carrie; Devaiah, Ganga; Voss, Deward H.

doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000483415.76116.ed

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A study of the pain intensity in the present study demonstrated that patients in the GA group experienced more pain in recovery compared to patients in the SA group, and the need for analgesics in this group was naturally higher in comparison with the other group, which corroborates with the results of other studies (24,25) It seems that other side effects of injectable medications during SA and the blockage of nerves in the lower extremities are the main reasons for the lack of an understanding of pain following this anesthesia. Therefore, the use of this method significantly reduces the severity of pain in the recovery unit, leading to a reduction in the need for analgesics.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Comparison of General Anesthesia With Spinal Anesthesia on the Quality of Recovery of Patients With Selective Abdominal Hysterectomy in Patients Vising the Largest Women’s Disease Hospital in Northwestern Iran

Mortazavi

Parish

Dorosti

et al. 2020

International Journal of Women’s Health and Reproduction Scienc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: The quality of recovery can affect the results of abdominal hysterectomy although this effect is unknown in different methods of anesthesia. Therefore, the present study was conducted to compare general anesthesia (GA) and spinal anesthesia (SA) methods on the quality of the recovery of patients with selective abdominal hysterectomy in patients visiting the largest women’s disease hospital in Northwestern Iran. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted with the participation of 350 patients with abdominal hysterectomy, who were selected by convenience sampling in Al-Zahra hospital, Tabriz, Iran in 2019. Demographic data, visual pain scale, hemodynamic status, and Aldrete-Kroulik index were recorded for each patient. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney, t-test, multivariate regression, and Kolmogorov-Simonov tests in SPSS 20, and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: In the hemodynamic status, it was found that the SA group was more stable than the GA group but this difference was not significant (P>0.05). Regarding the need for pethidine, the results revealed that the mean (± standard deviation) of the GA group was significantly higher (35.14 ± 10.14) than that of the SA group (20.15 ± 05.25, P=0.039) while there were no significant differences between the two groups in the use of the antiemetic drug (P=0.203). Finally, the evaluations of the quality of recovery showed that the mean±) SD) of the quality of recovery in SA patients was significantly higher compared to GA patients (P=0.015). Conclusions: In general, the quality of recovery was higher in the SA compared to the GA regarding abdominal hysterectomy.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Comparison of General Anesthesia With Spinal Anesthesia on the Quality of Recovery of Patients With Selective Abdominal Hysterectomy in Patients Vising the Largest Women’s Disease Hospital in Northwestern Iran

Mortazavi

Parish

Dorosti

et al. 2020

International Journal of Women’s Health and Reproduction Scienc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The neonatal respiratory distress is linked to the high rate of preterm birth, the CS itself, and the GA, which is also considered as an independent factor of neonatal complications. Indeed, studies that compared materno-fetal outcomes between GA and LRA found a significant .he APGAR score of newborns [16,17]. Similarly, Aiken et al, in a study about the unplanned secondary conversion of LRA to GA, reported a significant delay in the newborn's breathing [18].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

General Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Indications and Materno-Fetal Outcomes

Richa¹

2023

J Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Fetal and Maternal Outcomes Following Cesarean Hysterectomy

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Comparison of General Anesthesia With Spinal Anesthesia on the Quality of Recovery of Patients With Selective Abdominal Hysterectomy in Patients Vising the Largest Women’s Disease Hospital in Northwestern Iran

Comparison of General Anesthesia With Spinal Anesthesia on the Quality of Recovery of Patients With Selective Abdominal Hysterectomy in Patients Vising the Largest Women’s Disease Hospital in Northwestern Iran

General Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Indications and Materno-Fetal Outcomes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About