2010
DOI: 10.1108/17852951011056900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Festival management innovation and failure

Abstract: Purpose -The paper seeks to examine the concepts, types and implications of festival innovation and failure. Design/methodology/approach -A review of extant literature is undertaken and examples of innovation and failure in three festivals are used to demonstrate the simultaneity and co-dependency of innovation and failure in the process of festival management. Findings -It is apparent that many forms of program, market, service, organisational and financial innovation are available to festival managers. Many … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously published research explains the origins of the questions and results regarding resource dependency and stakeholder theory. The previous studies relate to a survey of festivals in Sweden , 2009a, 2009b, and a four-country comparison (Carlsen, Andersson, Ali-Knight, Jaeger, & Taylor, 2010;.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously published research explains the origins of the questions and results regarding resource dependency and stakeholder theory. The previous studies relate to a survey of festivals in Sweden , 2009a, 2009b, and a four-country comparison (Carlsen, Andersson, Ali-Knight, Jaeger, & Taylor, 2010;.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strategies need to be created before the event and contingencies need to be put in place to cater for any weather conditions (Carlsen, Andersson, Ali-Knight, Jaeger, & Taylor, 2010). Students should be encouraged to develop contingency plans for various weather conditions.…”
Section: Event Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, prior studies of festival production have not considered the impact of the festival's reputation on visitor attendance (e.g., Lee, Petrick, & Crompton, 2007) and stakeholders' motivation for collaboration (e.g., Larson, 2002). However, as Getz and Andersson (2008) have argued, flexible and innovative marketing and managerial actions are necessary for building market popularity, political support and access to resources in the long term (Carlsen, Andersson, Ali-Knight, Jaeger, & Taylor, 2010;Rentschler, Radbourne, Carr, & Rickard, 2002;Colbert, 2007). The aim of such actions is to create positive WOM and attitudes and to build trust in the festival (e.g., Collin-Lachaud & Duyck, 2002;Larson, 2002;Lee et al, 2007;.…”
Section: Conceptualising Reputation and Wom Through A Cultural Brandimentioning
confidence: 99%