The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1696-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fesoterodine in randomised clinical trials: an updated systematic clinical review of efficacy and safety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present efficacy data are in line with those from numerous clinical trials with fesoterodine , including studies on patient‐reported outcomes , long‐term studies and dedicated studies in elderly people . Moreover, the overall improvement of patient‐reported outcomes PPBC and PPUS is comparable with those reported previously from observational studies with other muscarinic receptor antagonists including tolterodine or solifenacin .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The present efficacy data are in line with those from numerous clinical trials with fesoterodine , including studies on patient‐reported outcomes , long‐term studies and dedicated studies in elderly people . Moreover, the overall improvement of patient‐reported outcomes PPBC and PPUS is comparable with those reported previously from observational studies with other muscarinic receptor antagonists including tolterodine or solifenacin .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The incidence of treatment‐emergent AEs in this study was considerably lower than in controlled studies with fesoterodine or other muscarinic antagonists . However, the qualitative spectrum of mostly dry mouth and constipation was in line with those studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The tarafenacin 0.2 mg group was identified to be superior to the placebo group in the mean change of the number of micturitions per 24 h from baseline to 4 weeks. Clinical trials for other anticholinergics such as solifenacin or fesoterodine have reported of their efficacy of mean change micturition per 24 h from baseline −1.6 to −3.0 with fesoterodine (4 and 8 mg) and −1.9 to 2.8 with solifenacin (5 and 10 mg) in some meta‐analyses . In this study, tarafenacin has shown a similar efficacy when compared with them.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Interestingly, the incidence rate of constipation was remarkably less than that for the other antimuscarinic drugs. The reported incidence rates of constipation were 15.1% with oxybutynin , 6% with tolterodine , 4% with 4 mg and 6% with 8 mg in fesoterodine fumarate , 5.4% with 5 mg and 13.4% with 10 mg with solifenacin , 5.8% with trospium chloride , 14.8% with 7.5 mg and 21.3% with 15 mg with darifenacin . The rate of constipation of tarafenacin in this study is comparatively lower than that of other equivalent alternative anticholinergic agents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%