1950
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1950.00021962004200110004x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fertilizer Evaluation of Certain Phosphorus, Phosphorous, and Phosphoric Materials by Means of Pot Cultures1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite all these biochemical adaptations, there are no data demonstrating that plants can convert Phi to Pi (MacIntire et al, 1950;Guest and Grant, 1991). 31 P NMR studies provided evidence that Phi could not be converted to other Pi-containing compounds in plants, indicating that Phi is unable to serve as a substrate for Pi-dependent enzymes (Carswell et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite all these biochemical adaptations, there are no data demonstrating that plants can convert Phi to Pi (MacIntire et al, 1950;Guest and Grant, 1991). 31 P NMR studies provided evidence that Phi could not be converted to other Pi-containing compounds in plants, indicating that Phi is unable to serve as a substrate for Pi-dependent enzymes (Carswell et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite having similar structure and mobility, the published data indicate that Phi is a non-metabolizable form of Pi and plants cannot use this as the sole source of P (Sukarno et al, 1993;Carswell et al, 1996;Forster et al, 1998). One of the distinct differences between Pi and Phi is that Pi can be assimilated into organic P compounds within minutes of uptake, whereas plants lack the ability to assimilate Phi (MacIntire et al, 1950;Guest and Grant, 1991). Furthermore, enzymes that catalyze the transfer of Pi groups can discriminate between Pi and Phi (Guest and Grant, 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When applied to crops on soil with sufficient OP availability, Phi may act as a fungicide that prevents negative effects of even minor infections by Oomycetes, such as Pythophthora (Förster et al, 1998). Plants cultivated under low P status conditions where Phi has been applied, however, can grow more poorly even when only a small fraction of total P is supplemented with Phi (Avila et al, 2011; MacIntire et al, 1950). This is likely due to attenuation of the plant's P starvation response systems, such as release of enzymes to metabolize exogenous nucleic acids and alterations of root morphology, that would normally attempt to correct low internal P status.…”
Section: Alternative Phosphorus Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because weeds cannot use the applied Phi, control is enhanced as crop canopy develops through increased shading, further bolstering crop competitiveness (Pandeya et al, 2018). One concern of soil applying Phi is that repeated use could lead to a buildup of OP over time as soil microorganisms oxidize the reduced P species (López‐Arredondo and Herrera‐Estrella, 2012; MacIntire et al, 1950). The impact of this on the efficacy of the transgenic approach is uncertain at this time and likely to be a function, at least in part, of inherent soil properties (MacIntire et al, 1950).…”
Section: Alternative Phosphorus Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the compounds proved to be good sources of nutri ent phosphorus and nitrogen. Other workers, Allison (1) and Maclntire and co-workers (20), found in pot tests that the phosphorus nitrides had practically no plant-food value. They concluded that to be effective as fertilizers, phosphorus nitrides must be converted to other compounds of nitrogen and phosporus.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 98%