2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-007-9591-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fertility variation and its impact on seed crops in seed production areas and a natural stand of teak in southern India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(14 reference statements)
3
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Teak trees in natural stands are bearing more number of fruits (Varghese et al, 2008). This is also evident in the case of A. leucophloea as it produced more number of PriBr in all study fruit production per tree varied considerably across stands.…”
Section: Growth and Reproductive Outputsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Teak trees in natural stands are bearing more number of fruits (Varghese et al, 2008). This is also evident in the case of A. leucophloea as it produced more number of PriBr in all study fruit production per tree varied considerably across stands.…”
Section: Growth and Reproductive Outputsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…These will have strong implications in germplasm collection, tree improvement and genetic con-As far as forest trees are concerned, viable natural stands are the starting point of domestication and a proper selection of plus trees from natural stands is obligatory for the successful operation of any tree breeding program (Gregorius and Muller, 1975). Tree growth is frequently the sole criterion for selection of seed stands (Varghese et al, 2008). Earlier, several researches have proved that fertility estimation of forest trees by assessing feasible approach for selecting good stands (Bila and Lindgren, 1998;Nikkanen and Ruotsalainen, 2000;Krouchi et al, 2004;Varghese et al, 2006;Kamalakannan et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last four decades several studies have examined pollination (Bryndum and Hedegart 1969, Hedegart 1973, Kedarnath 1974, Tangmitcharoen and Owens 1997a, Palupi and Owens 1997, Palupi et al 2010), pollinator behavior (Tangmitcharoen et al 2006a, b, 2009), reproductive phenology (Palupi and Owens 1998), pollen germination (Egenti 1978, Tangmitcharoen and Owens 1997b), fertility variation (Varghese et al 2008) and genetic variation and mating systems (Kertadikara and Prat 1995) of this species. It has been shown that teak is a diploid, 2n = 36, (Gill et al 1983, Kertadikara and Prat 1995), hermaphroditic, self incompatible (Hedegart 1973, Tangmitcharoen and Owens 1997b) and entomophiliously out‐crossing (Bryndum and Hedegart 1969, Hedegart 1973, Kedarnath 1974) species known for poor seed production (Nagarajan et al 1996, Palupi and Owens 1998).…”
Section: Study Species: Importance and Work Done On Reproductive Biolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BILA et al (1999) reported 80 % of trees to be flowering in a 65-year old teak plantation in Mozambique. Fertility in 40 to 45 year old teak stands is also generally high in south India ranging from 58 to 97 % (VARGHESE et al, 2008). The flowering behaviour of clones originating from the same location was different in the two orchards.…”
Section: Flowering and Fruiting In Orchardsmentioning
confidence: 98%