Abstract:Results: During the follow-up period of median 92 months, range 11-185 months, no relapse was found in the patients with stage Ia tumors including both the borderline tumors (n=12) and the invasive well (n=9) and moderately (n=1) differentiated ovarian cancers. One patient with poorly differentiated ovarian cancer stage 1c was pregnant at 13 weeks at the primary operation.Although, unilateral oophorectomy was performed she insisted in continuing the pregnancy. At 37 weeks she had a caesarian section and the ov… Show more
“…I ovarian cancer by substage, histology and grade in young women Stage IA, non-CCC, G1 FSS is recommended for patients with Stage IA non-CCC and G1 disease. When data from 10 papers containing sufficient information about patients with Stage IA non-CCC and G1 disease (2,4,(10)(11)(12)(13)(16)(17)(18)(19) were combined, the recurrence-free rate was 93.4% (282/302), and the survival rate was 98.0% (296/302) ( Table 2). FSS not followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is adequate treatment for patients in this group because the absolute prognosis is good.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Survival and Relapse After Conservative Managementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When data from nine papers containing sufficient information about patients with Stage IA non-CCC and G2 disease (2,4,(10)(11)(12)(13)(17)(18)(19) were combined, although the recurrence-free rate was somewhat low, at 87.5% (70/80), the survival rate was high, at 95% (76/80) ( Table 3). One patient was alive with cancer, and for one the prognosis was unknown, but even if these two individuals were to be added to the number of deaths, the survival rate would still exceed 90%, at 92.5%.…”
Section: Conservative Management Of Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described above, most of the studies from countries other than Japan have counted CCC as G3 disease, but it is possible to identify the number of cases of G3 disease that are not CCC from some carefully written papers from overseas (although for papers that included patients of Stage II and above, we assumed that patients with CCC were only Stage I). When data from nine papers containing sufficient information about patients with Stage I cancer and G3 disease (not including those with CCC) (2,4,10,11,13,17,19,39,40) were combined, the recurrence-free rate was extremely low for Stage I, at 54.1% (20/37), and the survival rate was also low, at 67.6% (25/37) ( Table 8). One patient was alive with cancer, and if this individual were to be added to the number of deaths, the survival rate would be 64.9% (24/37).…”
Section: Stage Ia or Ic (Unilateral Disease) G3 (Ccc Excluded)mentioning
Discussion of fertility-sparing treatment is an important part of pretreatment counseling for young patients with early epithelial ovarian cancer. As a result of late childbearing nowadays, fertility preservation has become a major issue in ovarian cancer patients. The purpose of this review is to update current knowledge on fertility-sparing treatment for early stage epithelial ovarian cancer, which may be useful for pretreatment counseling for reproductive-age patients. The multicenter study data on the fertility-sparing treatment published by Japan Clinical Oncology Group in 2010 confirmed that fertility-sparing surgery is a safe treatment for Stage IA patients with nonclear cell histology and Grade 1 or 2 and suggested that Stage IA patients with clear cell histology and Stage IC patients with non-clear cell histology and Grade 1 or 2 can be candidates for fertilitysparing surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. In the current review, we added the recent case series and review, and discussed the fertility-sparing treatment on young patients with early epithelial ovarian cancer. We need not to change the proposal by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group study, but we should wait for the results of an ongoing prospective study to strongly recommend the proposal of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group study.
“…I ovarian cancer by substage, histology and grade in young women Stage IA, non-CCC, G1 FSS is recommended for patients with Stage IA non-CCC and G1 disease. When data from 10 papers containing sufficient information about patients with Stage IA non-CCC and G1 disease (2,4,(10)(11)(12)(13)(16)(17)(18)(19) were combined, the recurrence-free rate was 93.4% (282/302), and the survival rate was 98.0% (296/302) ( Table 2). FSS not followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is adequate treatment for patients in this group because the absolute prognosis is good.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Survival and Relapse After Conservative Managementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When data from nine papers containing sufficient information about patients with Stage IA non-CCC and G2 disease (2,4,(10)(11)(12)(13)(17)(18)(19) were combined, although the recurrence-free rate was somewhat low, at 87.5% (70/80), the survival rate was high, at 95% (76/80) ( Table 3). One patient was alive with cancer, and for one the prognosis was unknown, but even if these two individuals were to be added to the number of deaths, the survival rate would still exceed 90%, at 92.5%.…”
Section: Conservative Management Of Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described above, most of the studies from countries other than Japan have counted CCC as G3 disease, but it is possible to identify the number of cases of G3 disease that are not CCC from some carefully written papers from overseas (although for papers that included patients of Stage II and above, we assumed that patients with CCC were only Stage I). When data from nine papers containing sufficient information about patients with Stage I cancer and G3 disease (not including those with CCC) (2,4,10,11,13,17,19,39,40) were combined, the recurrence-free rate was extremely low for Stage I, at 54.1% (20/37), and the survival rate was also low, at 67.6% (25/37) ( Table 8). One patient was alive with cancer, and if this individual were to be added to the number of deaths, the survival rate would be 64.9% (24/37).…”
Section: Stage Ia or Ic (Unilateral Disease) G3 (Ccc Excluded)mentioning
Discussion of fertility-sparing treatment is an important part of pretreatment counseling for young patients with early epithelial ovarian cancer. As a result of late childbearing nowadays, fertility preservation has become a major issue in ovarian cancer patients. The purpose of this review is to update current knowledge on fertility-sparing treatment for early stage epithelial ovarian cancer, which may be useful for pretreatment counseling for reproductive-age patients. The multicenter study data on the fertility-sparing treatment published by Japan Clinical Oncology Group in 2010 confirmed that fertility-sparing surgery is a safe treatment for Stage IA patients with nonclear cell histology and Grade 1 or 2 and suggested that Stage IA patients with clear cell histology and Stage IC patients with non-clear cell histology and Grade 1 or 2 can be candidates for fertilitysparing surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. In the current review, we added the recent case series and review, and discussed the fertility-sparing treatment on young patients with early epithelial ovarian cancer. We need not to change the proposal by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group study, but we should wait for the results of an ongoing prospective study to strongly recommend the proposal of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group study.
“…* Values are presented as mean (range) or number of subjects (Zanetta et al, 1997;Borgfeldt et al, 2007). A French multicentric study [Groupe des Chirurgiens de Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer (GCCLCC) and Société Française d′Oncologie Gynécologique (SFOG)] recommended that conservative surgery is acceptable in young patients with Stage Ia Grade 1 disease, but not suitable for stages higher than Ia (Morice et al, 2005).…”
Abstract:Objective: To assess the clinical outcomes of fertility-sparing treatments in young patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). Methods: A retrospective study of young EOC inpatients (≤40 years old) was performed during January 1994 and December 2010 in eight institutions. Results: Data were analyzed from 94 patients treated with fertility-sparing surgery with a median follow-up time of 58.7 months. As histologic grade increased, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients receiving fertility-sparing surgery declined. Neither staging surgery nor laparoscopy of early stage EOC with conservative surgery had a significant effect on OS or DFS. Normal menstruation recommenced after chemotherapy in 89% of the fertility-sparing group. Seventeen pregnancies among twelve patients were achieved by the end of the follow-ups. Conclusions: Fertility-sparing treatment for patients with EOC Stage I Grade 1 could be cautiously considered for young patients. The surgical procedure and surgical route might not significantly influence the prognosis. Standard chemotherapy is not likely to have an evident impact on ovarian function or fertility in young patients.
“…3 However, it is generally agreed that after comprehensive staging, well-differentiated or moderately differentiated stage IA cancers do not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, because their overall prognosis is excellent without adjuvant treatment. 9,12,13,14 In addition, per the National Comprehensive Center Network guidelines, both comprehensively staged grade 1 and 2, stage IA and IB epithelial ovarian cancer can be observed. 15 For all other categories of stage I disease, adjuvant treatment is recommended.…”
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the effect of tumor capsule rupture on disease prognosis in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.
METHODS: All patients with International Federation of
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.