2017
DOI: 10.56093/ijans.v87i8.73423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fertility response in post-partum buffaloes following bypass nutrient supplementation

Abstract: The study was designed to deduce the effect of by-pass nutrient supplementation on follicular profile and fertility response in post-partum buffaloes. For this study, 40 post-partum buffaloes divided into 4 groups [control (10): C, no supplementation; T1 (10), bypass fat supplementation; T2 (10), bypass protein supplementation and T3 (10), bypass fat and protein supplementation] were supplemented with bypass nutrient for 90 days postpartum from day of calving. The study animals were examined at every 10 days i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Enhancing PG-based ES with either gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) at the time of AI increases the pregnancy rate from 20% to 37% (Atabay et al, 2020). The use of T A B L E 1 Estrus synchronization protocols and results in swamp and riverine buffaloes using luteolytic and luteotropic agents or in combination with other hormones Chantaraprateep et al, 1981;Chirachaikitti et al, 1982;Chantaraprateep et al, 1983;Capitan et al, 1992;Yuan et al, 2008;Sianturi et al, 2012 PG Virakal et al, 1988 Norgestomet + PMSG 45.5 39.13 Virakal et al, 1988 Riverine PG single dose 75.0-100.0 41.5-80.0 Pant & Singh, 1991;Khattab et al, 1996;Ribeiro et al, 1998;Brito et al, 2002 PG double dose 11-12 days apart 25.0-95.0 22.8-83.0 Chohan et al, 1993;Diaz et al, 1994;Singh & Dabas, 1998;Misra et al, 2003;Srivastava, 2005. Norgestomet + E2 60.0-100 30.0-70.0 Phadnis et al, 1994;Patel et al, 2003 Norgestomet + eCG 86.0-97.6 44.6-66.7 Luthra et al, 1994;Malik et al, 2011 Norgestomet + PG 100 45.0-66.7 Utage et al, 2010;Chaudhary et al, 2015 Abbreviations: CIDR, controlled internal drug release; E2, estradiol; eCG, equine chorionic gonadotropin; GnRH, gonadotropin releasing hormone; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; PG, prostaglandin; PMSG, pregnant mare serum gonadotropin; PRID, progesterone releasing intravaginal device.…”
Section: Estrus Synchronization (Es) In Buffaloesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enhancing PG-based ES with either gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) at the time of AI increases the pregnancy rate from 20% to 37% (Atabay et al, 2020). The use of T A B L E 1 Estrus synchronization protocols and results in swamp and riverine buffaloes using luteolytic and luteotropic agents or in combination with other hormones Chantaraprateep et al, 1981;Chirachaikitti et al, 1982;Chantaraprateep et al, 1983;Capitan et al, 1992;Yuan et al, 2008;Sianturi et al, 2012 PG Virakal et al, 1988 Norgestomet + PMSG 45.5 39.13 Virakal et al, 1988 Riverine PG single dose 75.0-100.0 41.5-80.0 Pant & Singh, 1991;Khattab et al, 1996;Ribeiro et al, 1998;Brito et al, 2002 PG double dose 11-12 days apart 25.0-95.0 22.8-83.0 Chohan et al, 1993;Diaz et al, 1994;Singh & Dabas, 1998;Misra et al, 2003;Srivastava, 2005. Norgestomet + E2 60.0-100 30.0-70.0 Phadnis et al, 1994;Patel et al, 2003 Norgestomet + eCG 86.0-97.6 44.6-66.7 Luthra et al, 1994;Malik et al, 2011 Norgestomet + PG 100 45.0-66.7 Utage et al, 2010;Chaudhary et al, 2015 Abbreviations: CIDR, controlled internal drug release; E2, estradiol; eCG, equine chorionic gonadotropin; GnRH, gonadotropin releasing hormone; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; PG, prostaglandin; PMSG, pregnant mare serum gonadotropin; PRID, progesterone releasing intravaginal device.…”
Section: Estrus Synchronization (Es) In Buffaloesmentioning
confidence: 99%