2021
DOI: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2021ao5859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fertility preservation in breast cancer with oral progestin: is it an option? A pilot study

Abstract: Objective: To compare the effectiveness of oral progestins and injectable gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist medication in cancer fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer. Methods: A cross-sectional study with 40 breast cancer patients submitted to cancer fertility preservation, who were divided into two groups according to histochemical analysis of progesterone receptors to define luteinizing hormone block: if positive, use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, if negative, use of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies by Oishi et al ., 14 Oliveira et al . 15 and Hanada et al . 16 were excluded because of the wrong intervention, as they did not use long-acting GnRHa after ovulation induction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The studies by Oishi et al ., 14 Oliveira et al . 15 and Hanada et al . 16 were excluded because of the wrong intervention, as they did not use long-acting GnRHa after ovulation induction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Seven studies were excluded from data extraction and review. The studies by Oishi et al, 14 Oliveira et al 15 and Hanada et al 16 were excluded because of the wrong intervention, as they did not use long-acting GnRHa after ovulation induction. The study by Massarotti et al 17 was excluded because of the wrong intervention, as the authors used the long-acting GnRHa to trigger ovulation after COH and did not use the medication after the ovulation induction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%