2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fertility in beef cattle given a new or previously used CIDR insert and estradiol, with or without progesterone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
34
3
9

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
9
34
3
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to our findings, a previous report showed higher conception rate in heifers (67.9%) than cows (53.1%) [52]. The present study recorded lower pregnancy loss (5.1%) in cows compared with previous reports where the loss in cows was 20% when PGF2α/ progestins was used [53].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Contrary to our findings, a previous report showed higher conception rate in heifers (67.9%) than cows (53.1%) [52]. The present study recorded lower pregnancy loss (5.1%) in cows compared with previous reports where the loss in cows was 20% when PGF2α/ progestins was used [53].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…The pregnancy rates of the intravaginal device groups were lower than those found by Bader et al (2005) and Schafer et al (2007), but similar to those found by Colazo et al (2004). In a study of Nelore cows synchronized using an intravaginal P4 device, Silveira et al (2012) reported pregnancy rates of 53%.…”
Section: Siqueira Et Al (2009) Also Reported Similar Data Inmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Colazo et al (2004) reported that CIDR loss rate tended to be higher in heifers receiving a used CIDR than in those receiving new ones. However, no significant difference was found in the number of lost devices between ewes receiving new or used ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%