2019
DOI: 10.1177/1474704919843103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fertility-Dependent Acoustic Variation in Women’s Voices Previously Shown to Affect Listener Physiology and Perception

Abstract: Previous research demonstrates that listeners perceive women's voices as more attractive when recorded at high compared to low fertility phases of the menstrual cycle. This effect has been repeated with multiple voice recording samples, but one stimuli set has shown particularly robust replications. First collected by Pipitone and Gallup (2008), women were recorded counting from 1-10 on approximately the same day and time once a week for 4 weeks. Repeatedly, studies using these recordings have shown that natur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(135 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Encoded information (Gangestad et al, 2002;Haselton et al, 2007) Voice pitch Correlates with the fertile phase. Encoded information and receivers' response (Pipitone & Gallup, 2008Pisanski et al, 2018;Shoup-Knox et al, 2019) Body odor Pleasantness may correlate with the period of highest fertility.…”
Section: Proceptive Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Encoded information (Gangestad et al, 2002;Haselton et al, 2007) Voice pitch Correlates with the fertile phase. Encoded information and receivers' response (Pipitone & Gallup, 2008Pisanski et al, 2018;Shoup-Knox et al, 2019) Body odor Pleasantness may correlate with the period of highest fertility.…”
Section: Proceptive Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hormonal state matches that of the ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle. Interestingly, research has not consistently demonstrated any acoustic fluctuations that account for listener preference, or that correlate with hormonal status (Puts et al, 2013;Bryant & Haselton, 2009;Pavela Banai, 2017;Fischer et al, 2011;Karthikeyan & Locke, 2015;Celik et al, 2013;Shoup-Knox et al, 2019). Collectively, these findings suggest that the voice varies across the menstrual cycle in ways that elude typical acoustic measures, but clearly impact listener responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%