1974
DOI: 10.1021/bi00719a019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ferrous porphyrins in organic solvents. I. Preparation and coordinating properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

6
83
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(34 reference statements)
6
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the Fe(III)TPP(Im) intermediate was not observed in the equilibrium reaction [8,9]. Similarly, predominantly six-coordinate iron(II) bis-Im porphyrin model has been observed upon addition of Im to ferrous heme in organic solvents [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, the Fe(III)TPP(Im) intermediate was not observed in the equilibrium reaction [8,9]. Similarly, predominantly six-coordinate iron(II) bis-Im porphyrin model has been observed upon addition of Im to ferrous heme in organic solvents [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, hexacoordinate bis-imidazole complexes are much more stable than the pentacoordinate intermediate (5)(6)(7). Although a much weaker ligand, water competes effectively against the binding of the first imidazole base in aqueous solution, causing the apparent equilibrium dissociation constant to be Ն10 Ϫ2 -10 Ϫ4 M (7). Hemoglobins and myoglobins have evolved to stabilize the mono-imidazole heme complex to facilitate reversible O 2 binding to the sixth coordination position.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heme potential is described in the previous section. The bonding potential of the axial ligands can be rep- (23,24) and iron-oxygen (25) bonds respectively.t A value of 2.4 A-1 is estimated for the parameter a by analyzing the stretching vibrations of transition metal complexes (17). The equilibrium parameters bo are taken as the corresponding observed equilibrium values ( Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%