2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/6687391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ferroptosis-Related Gene Model to Predict Overall Survival of Ovarian Carcinoma

Abstract: Background. Ovarian cancer (OC) is the eighth most common cause of cancer death and the second cause of gynecologic cancer death in women around the world. Ferroptosis, an iron-dependent regulated cell death, plays a vital role in the development of many cancers. Applying expression of ferroptosis-related gene to forecast the cancer progression is helpful for cancer treatment. However, the relationship between ferroptosis-related genes and OC patient prognosis is still vastly unknown, making it still a challen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(29 reference statements)
5
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the AUCs of the signatures at 3, and 5 years were 0.709, 0.762, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of most hallmark predictive models. Table 4 shows that the AUCs of the other three prognostic signatures, namely, the 21 immune‐related gene signature, 35 17 immune‐related gene signature (0.754 at 3 years, 0.824 at 5 years) 36 and 17 transcription factor ‐related gene signature (0.803 at 5 years), 37 were comparable to the predictive capabilities of our predictive model and distinctly higher than those of other signatures, such as the epithelial‐mesenchymal transition related gene signature, 38 TME‐related gene signature, 39,40 RNA‐binding protein‐related gene signature, 41 energy metabolism‐related gene signature, 42 autophagy‐related gene signature, 43,44 ferroptosis‐related gene signature, 45 protein‐coding gene signature, 46 and DNA methylated gene signatures 47 . The larger the AUC value of a biomarker, the better was the predictive ability of the signature, indicating that our gene signature outperformed most of the other signatures in predicting OV prognosis.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, the AUCs of the signatures at 3, and 5 years were 0.709, 0.762, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of most hallmark predictive models. Table 4 shows that the AUCs of the other three prognostic signatures, namely, the 21 immune‐related gene signature, 35 17 immune‐related gene signature (0.754 at 3 years, 0.824 at 5 years) 36 and 17 transcription factor ‐related gene signature (0.803 at 5 years), 37 were comparable to the predictive capabilities of our predictive model and distinctly higher than those of other signatures, such as the epithelial‐mesenchymal transition related gene signature, 38 TME‐related gene signature, 39,40 RNA‐binding protein‐related gene signature, 41 energy metabolism‐related gene signature, 42 autophagy‐related gene signature, 43,44 ferroptosis‐related gene signature, 45 protein‐coding gene signature, 46 and DNA methylated gene signatures 47 . The larger the AUC value of a biomarker, the better was the predictive ability of the signature, indicating that our gene signature outperformed most of the other signatures in predicting OV prognosis.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The included studies 11,35–47,54–61 used models built based on the TCGA cohort and involved all types of breast cancer. The final results showed that our signature and three other prognostic signatures, namely, a 21 immune‐related gene signature, 35 17 immune‐related gene signature 36 and 17 TF‐related gene signature 37 performed better than the other hallmark signatures in the prediction of OS in patients with OV 11,35,38–47,54–61 . Additionally, Yu et al has constructed a five GRG signature (ANGPTL4, PYGB, ISG20, SEH1L and IRS2) for patients with OV 62 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…be a feasible treatment of pancreatic cancer. Similar research results can also be found in lung adenocarcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, and uveal melanoma (Gao et al, 2021;Luo and Ma, 2021;Yang L. et al, 2021). However, no studies have attempted to construct a ferroptosis-related prognostic model of PCa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…As shown in Figure 4, the AUC for this signature was 0.705, which was higher than the existing ferroptosis-related signatures. This result revealed that our established signature was superior to other signatures in predicting patient's survival information (Yu et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2021;Yang et al, 2021;Zhu et al, 2021).…”
Section: Validation Of Ferroptosis-related Prognosis Signature In the Cancer Genome Atlas Testing Cohortmentioning
confidence: 73%