2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.125.147201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ferromagnetic Resonance Assisted Optomechanical Magnetometer

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the specific parameters that influence the precise behavior of the optomechanical limit cycles [59], such as optical detuning, optomechanical coupling, and optical/mechanical linewidths, a good agreement is observed between the measured and simulated tongues. Such agreement suggests that the observed features are indeed dominated by the optomechanical interaction itself, in contrast to silicon optomechanical devices where thermal and charge carriers effects strongly influences the self-sustaining oscillator dynamics [19,71]. Although the numerical model is useful for confirming the optomechanical nature of the observed effects, it hardly provides any analytical insight on the origins of the observed synchronization effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the specific parameters that influence the precise behavior of the optomechanical limit cycles [59], such as optical detuning, optomechanical coupling, and optical/mechanical linewidths, a good agreement is observed between the measured and simulated tongues. Such agreement suggests that the observed features are indeed dominated by the optomechanical interaction itself, in contrast to silicon optomechanical devices where thermal and charge carriers effects strongly influences the self-sustaining oscillator dynamics [19,71]. Although the numerical model is useful for confirming the optomechanical nature of the observed effects, it hardly provides any analytical insight on the origins of the observed synchronization effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Since its observation by Huygens in the 17 th century, the synchronization of widely distinct systems have been shown to share remarkably universal features [1,2], fostering its exploration across many disciplines [3][4][5]. With the recent convergence among optical, mechanical and electrical waves using scalable microfabrication technologies, synchronization has emerged as a powerful tool targeted not only at technological applications, such as phaselock loops (PLLs) in radio-based communications [6][7][8], but also at developing the fundamentals of chaotic systems [9], injection locking [10][11][12], electro and optomechanical devices [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], nonlinear dynamics [21][22][23][24][25], network coupling [26][27][28][29], and quantum synchronization [30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the transmission rate is also dependent on ∆ m according to Eq. ( 14), implying that our hybrid model can be used in turn as a solid-state magnetometer [47][48][49][50]. In other words, one can detect the resonance frequency of the magnon mode and thereby the strength of the magnetic field via the transmission rate.…”
Section: Tunable Sensing With Photon-magnon Hybridizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensing performance can be further optimized by tuning the phase factor and the optimal working region can be changed due to the tunable resonance frequency of the magnon mode. On the other hand, the hybridization in turn enables sensing for the strength of the magnetic field, implying that our scheme can be used as a highperformance magnetometer [44][45][46][47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most optomechanical magnetometers [ 20 , 123 , 131 , 144 , 145 , 146 , 147 ], the deformation is due to magnetostrictive coatings or fillings that exert a field-dependent force (much like the aforementioned magnetostrictive magnetometers). Related designs [ 145 , 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 , 152 ] respond to the magnetic field gradient via the dipole force, or enhance the magnetostrictive response using ferromagnetic resonance [ 153 ]. Note that rapid progress is occurring in optomechanical sensing, not limited to magnetic fields, but also of other aerospace-relevant stimuli such as temperature [ 154 , 155 , 156 ], acoustic vibrations [ 157 , 158 ], pressure [ 159 ], force [ 160 , 161 ], and acceleration [ 162 , 163 , 164 , 165 ].…”
Section: Emerging Magnetometersmentioning
confidence: 99%