1964
DOI: 10.1063/1.1702873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ferromagnetic-Paramagnetic Transition in Iron

Abstract: Magnetization per gram of an iron sphere σ as a function of temperature T has been studied between the ferromagnetic Curie temperature TFC and TFC+30°K with applied magnetic fields between 180 and 1360 Oe. The temperature TFC, appearing as an abrupt decrease in the σ vs T curves, occurs at 1044±2°K. Mass magnetic susceptibility of iron, above the ferromagnetic Curie temperature in small magnetic fields, is proportional to (T-TFC)−4/3, which is the theoretical prediction for a Heisenberg three-dimensional ferro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
3

Year Published

1965
1965
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thorpe and Senfile [1964] have suggested that X• in splash-form tektites may be due to the presence of submicroscopic spherules in the glass. For a small ferromagnetic spherical particle the demagnetizing field is equal and opposite to the applied dc field, and therefore spherical iron or magnetite particles appear to be paramagnetic at low dc magnetic fields [see Arajs and Colvin, 1964]. Alternatively, the same spherules will be ferromagnetic at high magnetic fields (above saturation).…”
Section: Experimental Measurements and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thorpe and Senfile [1964] have suggested that X• in splash-form tektites may be due to the presence of submicroscopic spherules in the glass. For a small ferromagnetic spherical particle the demagnetizing field is equal and opposite to the applied dc field, and therefore spherical iron or magnetite particles appear to be paramagnetic at low dc magnetic fields [see Arajs and Colvin, 1964]. Alternatively, the same spherules will be ferromagnetic at high magnetic fields (above saturation).…”
Section: Experimental Measurements and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the paramagnetic susceptibility of ferrite satisfies the Curie-Weiss law only above 1150 K, the paramagnetic H ϭ 1.82 B derived from the Curie constant cannot be used for ferrite in most temperature ranges and it may be more reasonable to use the ferromagnetic H . [9] A mapping of the magnetization-magnetic field-temperature diagram (M-H-T) surface is calculated and is shown in Figure 4. This curve corresponds to the shape of an experimental curve, such as that reported by Gorodestsky et al [10] for the weak ferromagnet YFeO 3 .…”
Section: A Calculation Of the Phase Transformation Temperature Changmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are fitted as functions of temperature at the magnetic fields of 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 kOe, and are described by Eqs. [8], [9], [10], [11], and [12], respectively. at T Ͻ 1043 K and H ϭ 100 kOe at T Ͼ 1043 K and H ϭ 100 kOe [8] at T Ͻ 1043 K and H ϭ 200 kOe at T Ͼ 1043 K and H ϭ 200 kOe [9] at T Ͻ 1043 K and H ϭ 300 kOe at T Ͼ 1043 K and H ϭ 300 kOe [10] at T Ͻ 1043 K and H ϭ 400 kOe at T Ͼ 1043 K and H ϭ 400 kOe [11] at T Ͻ 1043 K and H ϭ 500 kOe at T Ͼ 1043 K and H ϭ 500 kOe [12] ⌬G M a (T) ϭ Ϫ39.…”
Section: Gibbs Free Energy Change By Magnetic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hao and Ohtsuka [12] reported a value 0.8 • C T −1 for the phase boundary between bcc and fcc of pure Fe in the paramagnetic state when the applied filed is low ( 10 T). In this report, the paramagnetic susceptibility data of pure Fe in its bcc and fcc structures [21][22][23][24][25][26][27] is first re-evaluated. The new susceptibility values as a function of temperature are then used to calculate the Gibbs energy change due to applied magnetic fields based upon the Curie-Weiss law.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%