2017
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.170254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ferrofluid lubrication of circular squeeze film bearings controlled by variable magnetic field with rotations of the discs, porosity and slip velocity

Abstract: Based on the Shliomis ferrofluid flow model (SFFM) and continuity equation for the film as well as porous region, modified Reynolds equation for lubrication of circular squeeze film bearings is derived by considering the effects of oblique radially variable magnetic field (VMF), slip velocity at the film–porous interface and rotations of both the discs. The squeeze film bearings are made up of circular porous upper disc of different shapes (exponential, secant, mirror image of secant and parallel) and circular… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, FF effects result in a very large increase in pressure for both the models in the small vicinity of the minimum film height. This happens because as X moves away from X=0 the upper surface of the cylinder become more and more convex with respect to lower plate, and it is known that such situation does not support increase in pressure and integrated Wtrue¯ due to increase in side leakage 6,14 . These behaviour of P also agrees with the observations of References 12,13.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, FF effects result in a very large increase in pressure for both the models in the small vicinity of the minimum film height. This happens because as X moves away from X=0 the upper surface of the cylinder become more and more convex with respect to lower plate, and it is known that such situation does not support increase in pressure and integrated Wtrue¯ due to increase in side leakage 6,14 . These behaviour of P also agrees with the observations of References 12,13.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Again, from Figures 3 and 4, it is observed that out of the total pressure generation in the interval 1.0X1.0, maximum generation (greater than 0.75) takes place approximately in the interval 0.2X0.2; that is, in the 20% of the region symmetric about the z ‐axis as shown in Figure 5. This happens because beyond this interval 0.2X0.2, the upper surface of the cylinder becomes more and more convex with respect to lower plate, and it is known that convex shape does not support increase in pressure and integrated dimensionless load‐carrying capacity Wtrue¯ due to increase in side leakage 6,14 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, different drag reduction effects were possessed by puffer epidermal mucus with different rheological properties. The relationship between apparent viscosity and drag reduction performance can be described using the following equation. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results for the dimensionless load‐carrying capacity W¯$\bar{W}$ given by Equation () are computed, where integral is evaluated using Simpson's one‐third rule by dividing the interval [0, 2π] into 10 subintervals of width π/5$\pi /5$. The representative values of the different parameters taken in computations are as follows [1, 15, 16, 21–25]. These values remain fixed unless and until the calculations of W¯$\bar{W}$ are made with respect to the variation of the particular parameter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming steady flow, neglecting inertia and the second derivative of the internal angular momentum S , Equations () and () of the Appendix , respectively, becomes [15, 16] p+η2boldv+μ(M)boldH+12μ×(M×H)=bold0,\begin{equation} - {\bm{\nabla }}p + \eta {\nabla ^2}{\bf v} + \mu ({\bf M}\centerdot {\bm{\nabla }}){\bf H} + \frac{1}{2}\mu {\bm{\nabla }} \times ({\bf M} \times {\bf H}) = {\bf 0}, \end{equation} boldM=M1HH+τB(boldΩ×M)μτsτBI[M×false(boldM×boldHfalse)],\begin{equation} {\bf M} = {M_1}\frac{{\bf H}}{H} + {\tau _B}({\bm{\Omega }} \times {\bf M}) - \frac{{\mu {\tau _s}{\tau _B}}}{I}[{\bf M} \times ({\bf M} \times {\bf H})], \end{equation}where M1=nm()coth0.28emξ11ξ1,0.28em0.28emξ1=0.28emμmHkBT.\begin{equation} {M_1} = nm\left( {\coth \;{\xi _1} - \frac{1}{{{\xi _1}}}} \right),\;\;{\xi _1} = \;\frac{{\mu mH}}{{{k_B}T}}. \end{equation}…”
Section: Generalized Ferrofluid Based Lubrication Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%