2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.96.044023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fermions in hybrid loop quantum cosmology

Abstract: This work pioneers the quantization of primordial fermion perturbations in hybrid Loop Quantum Cosmology (LQC). We consider a Dirac field coupled to a spatially flat, homogeneous, and isotropic cosmology, sourced by a scalar inflaton, and treat the Dirac field as a perturbation. We describe the inhomogeneities of this field in terms of creation and annihilation variables, chosen to admit a unitary evolution if the Dirac fermion were treated as a test field. Considering instead the full system, we truncate its … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the homogeneous part of these states, Γða; ϕÞ, where a generically denotes dependence on the homogeneous geometry, may be chosen as an exact solution to the, homogeneous, quantum FLRW model, and in this paper we will take it this way. However, let us comment that this choice is in principle not needed, and in fact one may consider other possibilities for Γ that incorporate the presence of some quantum backreaction of the perturbations onto the homogeneous sector of the model [19,63]. With this ansatz at hand, and provided that Γ is sufficiently peaked on the homogeneous geometry for all values of ϕ, then the imposition of the zero-mode of the Hamiltonian constraint leads to the requirement that the outcome of certain operators, acting exclusively on the Mukhanov-Sasaki and the tensor parts of the wave function, must be zero.…”
Section: A Hybrid Quantization Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the homogeneous part of these states, Γða; ϕÞ, where a generically denotes dependence on the homogeneous geometry, may be chosen as an exact solution to the, homogeneous, quantum FLRW model, and in this paper we will take it this way. However, let us comment that this choice is in principle not needed, and in fact one may consider other possibilities for Γ that incorporate the presence of some quantum backreaction of the perturbations onto the homogeneous sector of the model [19,63]. With this ansatz at hand, and provided that Γ is sufficiently peaked on the homogeneous geometry for all values of ϕ, then the imposition of the zero-mode of the Hamiltonian constraint leads to the requirement that the outcome of certain operators, acting exclusively on the Mukhanov-Sasaki and the tensor parts of the wave function, must be zero.…”
Section: A Hybrid Quantization Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A physically appealing possibility is to use this freedom, and hence remove (at least part of) the ambiguity, looking for annihilation and creation-like variables such that their Hamiltonian admits a quantum representation with good properties. In fact, there already exist some preliminary investigations about this issue in the technically simpler case of fermionic perturbations around flat FLRW spacetimes, within the hybrid LQC approach [31,53]. For a Dirac field in this cosmological scenario, one can also carry out a characterization of the annihilation and creation-like variables that define invariant vacua under the symmetry transformations of the system and display a unitarily implementable dynamics when considered on a classical background, all this while retaining a standard convention about the respective identification of particles and antiparticles [45].…”
Section: Further Specification Of Vacuamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of these approaches do not modify the dispersion relations of the perturbations, providing in particular a proper ultraviolet behavior that is compatible with the observed power spectra. These are the hybrid [20,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] and dressed metric approaches [21,[32][33][34][35][36][37]. Although there are plenty of similarities between these two approaches, the main distinctions follow from a slightly different strategy for the quantization of the perturbations [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…within the Hybrid Quantization Approach [32] in order to deal with (both scalar and fermionic) perturbations in quantum cosmology (see, for instance, Refs. [100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%