2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.82.115013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fermion number conservation and two-Higgs-doublet models without tree-level flavor-changing neutral currents

Abstract: The charged fermion mass matrices are always invariant under U (1) 3 symmetry linked to the fermion number transformation. A class of two Higgs doublet models (2HDM) can be identified by requiring that the definition of this symmetry in an arbitrary weak basis be independent of Higgs parameters such as the ratio of the Higgs vacuum expectation values. The tree level flavour changing neutral currents normally present in 2HDM are absent in this class of models but unlike the type I or type II Higgs doublet model… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This more general scenario can be formally described by the Lagrangian (2.10) with the substitution ς f M f → Y f . One could still use nine dimensionless parameters ς f ≡ y f /m f , one for each charged fermion [151], but in this case this is just a redefinition of the Yukawa couplings y f because a priori nothing relates them to the fermion masses [152]. The hierarchy of couplings characteristic of the A2HDM ansatz is lost and one can no longer justify that the leading charged-scalar effects originate in the heavier fermion couplings (it becomes an assumption).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This more general scenario can be formally described by the Lagrangian (2.10) with the substitution ς f M f → Y f . One could still use nine dimensionless parameters ς f ≡ y f /m f , one for each charged fermion [151], but in this case this is just a redefinition of the Yukawa couplings y f because a priori nothing relates them to the fermion masses [152]. The hierarchy of couplings characteristic of the A2HDM ansatz is lost and one can no longer justify that the leading charged-scalar effects originate in the heavier fermion couplings (it becomes an assumption).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…eq. (222). Under a CP transformation, besides the change in the sign of the space coordinates, H 1 transforms to its complex conjugate 24 while H 2 transforms to its complex conjugate apart from an arbitrary phase:…”
Section: A Minimal Realistic Model With Spontaneous Cp Violationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the processes B s → µ + µ − , with tree-level pseudoscalar exchange, and B → Kµ + µ − , with tree-level scalar exchange, will bound the product λ bs λ µµ ; it has been shown [107,222] that data will be obtained at the Tevatron and LHC which will bound the product to approximately 0.6 (for scalar or pseudoscalar masses of 120 GeV). One of the most interesting decays, since it vanishes in the SM, is B → Kµτ .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On a different line of thought, suppression (rather than the absence) of FCNCs in other "natural" manners has also attracted significant interest, including suppression given by masses like in the Cheng-Sher ansatz [54], suppression obtained from broken/approximate flavor symmetries [55][56][57][58], and symmetry controlled FCNC scenarios [59][60][61][62][63]. Among the latter, Branco-Grimus-Lavoura models are worth mentioning in particular, since this suppression is simply given by products of CKM matrix elements [64,65] (see also related extensions [66][67][68]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%