2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.88.100504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fermiology, orbital order, orbital fluctuations, and Cooper pairing in iron-based superconductors

Abstract: We address two important issues that arise in recent studies of iron-based superconductivity. (1) Why are the Tc of AxFe2−ySe2 and the single unit cell FeSe on SrTiO3 so high despite both only have electron pockets? (2) What (if any) are the effects of orbital order and orbital fluctuation on the Cooper pairing. Our conclusions are summarized in the third paragraph of the paper.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the strongcoupling approaches based on a localized spin picture, which can explain part of the observations, also face difficulties. The strong-coupling theories predict the s-wave superconducting state for AFS, [23][24][25] which is consistent with a fully gapped state but inconsistent with the observation of the spin resonance mode. 20) The situation is the same for orbitalfluctuation-mediated pairing theories, which predict signconserving s-wave states.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…On the other hand, the strongcoupling approaches based on a localized spin picture, which can explain part of the observations, also face difficulties. The strong-coupling theories predict the s-wave superconducting state for AFS, [23][24][25] which is consistent with a fully gapped state but inconsistent with the observation of the spin resonance mode. 20) The situation is the same for orbitalfluctuation-mediated pairing theories, which predict signconserving s-wave states.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This qualitative agreement becomes quantitative if one performs two typical for IBS transformations: orbital-dependent renormalizations and relative energy shift of the constructions in the center and the corner of the Brillouin Zone (BZ). While the former transformation is due to the Hund-rule coupling and is well captured by the DMFT calculations1011, the latter is not yet well understood, but can be related either to the so called s ± Pomeranchuk instability1213 or particle–hole asymmetry14. We note that such a shift, unlike the usually exercised “rigid” shift of the Fermi level, preserves the number of charge carriers in the system and results in singular Fermi surfaces in all known IBS e .…”
Section: Breakdown Of Tetragonal Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…There exist many excellent review articles which address the main questions, theoretical models, and experimental results [6,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In the following we provide an overview of the most relevant results for iron-based superconductors, and point the interested reader towards the aforementioned reviews for details.…”
Section: Iron-based Superconductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%