2018
DOI: 10.3390/galaxies6040117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fermi: Monitoring the Gamma-Ray Universe

Abstract: Since 2008, the Large Area Telescope and the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor on the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope have been monitoring the entire sky at energies from about 8 keV to more than 1 TeV. Photon-level data and high-level data products are made publicly available in near-real time, and efforts continue to improve the response time. This long-duration, all-sky monitoring has enabled a broad range of science, from atmospheric phenomena on Earth to signals from high-redshift sources. The Fermi instrum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use gamma-ray data from the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope. The Large Area Telescope (LAT) of the satellite is scanning the whole sky, and therefore it is a perfect instrument for systematic long-term studies [21]. Public light curves are available in weekly and daily binning 4,5 .…”
Section: Data Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use gamma-ray data from the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope. The Large Area Telescope (LAT) of the satellite is scanning the whole sky, and therefore it is a perfect instrument for systematic long-term studies [21]. Public light curves are available in weekly and daily binning 4,5 .…”
Section: Data Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting light curve is shown in Figure 5. 1 Data obtained using optical observations from the northern hemisphere, indicate that the optical light curve followed a similar, symmetric trend as the γ-ray flux past January 2017 [20]. The 2016-2017 outburst has been modeled using the model described briefly above.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rules out additive processes for the origin of the observed variability and instead favors multiplicative ones. 4 If this is true, then additive models (e.g., shot-noise or a simple superposition of many "mini-jets") are no longer adequate to describe the observed variability behavior, and multiplicative, cascade-like scenarios need to be invoked. 4 For a stationary stochastic process X that results from a multiplication of N random subprocesses x i , X = ∏ x i , the logarithm of X is equivalent to the sum of the logarithm of the individual x i , i.e., log X = log x 1 + log x 2 + ... + log x N .…”
Section: Pdf Shape and Log-normalitymentioning
confidence: 99%