2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.92.125304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fermi-level pinning through defects at GaAs/oxide interfaces: A density functional study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
22
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For this configuration, the CTLs are found to be e þ2=þ1 ¼ À0:06 eV relative to the VBM and e þ1=0 ¼ 0.43 eV relative the CBM, or in other words, within the valence and conduction bands, respectively, and do not give rise to states in the semiconductor bandgap. This result for the e þ1=0 level is in contrast to previous calculations of the As Ga antisite near the oxide in a model of the GaAs/ Al 2 O 3 interface 43 calculated within a hybrid DFT framework, which exhibited little difference to the corresponding CTLs of the bulk AsGa antisite. The discrepancy may be ascribed to a combination of factors including that the wide GaAs bandgap may result in significantly less hybridization between the band edges and the respective charged defect states compared to the narrower bandgap In 0.53 Ga 0.…”
Section: Ctls For Surface Defectscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For this configuration, the CTLs are found to be e þ2=þ1 ¼ À0:06 eV relative to the VBM and e þ1=0 ¼ 0.43 eV relative the CBM, or in other words, within the valence and conduction bands, respectively, and do not give rise to states in the semiconductor bandgap. This result for the e þ1=0 level is in contrast to previous calculations of the As Ga antisite near the oxide in a model of the GaAs/ Al 2 O 3 interface 43 calculated within a hybrid DFT framework, which exhibited little difference to the corresponding CTLs of the bulk AsGa antisite. The discrepancy may be ascribed to a combination of factors including that the wide GaAs bandgap may result in significantly less hybridization between the band edges and the respective charged defect states compared to the narrower bandgap In 0.53 Ga 0.…”
Section: Ctls For Surface Defectscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Interfacial bonding with O atoms bonding directly to a Ga in turn bonded to an As atom about the antisite is studied in Ref. 43, whereas the metal (Al) atoms of the oxide are bonding directly to As atoms at the semiconductor surface in the model used in this study, which are in turn bonding to the As atom corresponding to the antisite. The local chemical environment in Ref.…”
Section: Ctls For Surface Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…24,25 This scheme preserves the overall accuracy of hybrid functional calculations, [26][27][28][29][30] but significantly reduces the computational cost, thereby making possible the study of a large variety of defect positions within a disordered alloy, such as In 0.17 Al 0.83 N. To illustrate the accuracy of this scheme in the case of III-V compounds, we focused on the O N impurity in AlN. In agreement with previous studies, 13,31-33 we found that the defect is only stable in the singly positive and singly negative charge states, the latter being particularly stabilized by a displacement of the O atom out of the regular lattice site.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%