SAE Technical Paper Series 2011
DOI: 10.4271/2011-38-0024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FENSAP-ICE: Numerical Prediction of Ice Roughness Evolution, and its Effects on Ice Shapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The one-equation Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model was chosen for its stability and computational efficiency to provide the spatial distribution of the eddy viscosity needed for the momentum equations. A rough-wall treatment (Ozcer et al , 2011) has been included within the turbulence model in FENSAP to accurately calculate the convective heat transfer and shear stress on the surface (Figure 7).…”
Section: Results: Hovermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The one-equation Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model was chosen for its stability and computational efficiency to provide the spatial distribution of the eddy viscosity needed for the momentum equations. A rough-wall treatment (Ozcer et al , 2011) has been included within the turbulence model in FENSAP to accurately calculate the convective heat transfer and shear stress on the surface (Figure 7).…”
Section: Results: Hovermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the effect of surface roughness on the resultant ice shapes has been investigated first. In this manner, different constant sand-grain roughnesses (0, 0.5, 1, and 2 mm) and a variable roughness model, based on beads 11 , have been tested. The results of this first study allow the calibration of the icing model by defining the appropriate sand-grain roughness to employ.…”
Section: B Ice Shape Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 10 shows the intermediate ice shapes of the quasi-unsteady approach; 11 shots were considered for Run 61, and 7 shots for Run 36. Since ice formation is a cumulative process, the final ice shape is sensitive to the accuracy of the initial ice shape predictions 11 . In this manner, the duration of the first two shots (30 seconds each) is shorter than the duration of the remaining shots (60 seconds each).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial sand grain roughness height for the surface was assumed to be 0.5 mm and also a variable surface roughness model of FENSAP-ICE based on the beads was used. 26 The two-phase flow was solved using Eulerian-Eulerian approach in FENSAP-ICE. The main advantage of using Eulerian-Eulerian approach is that the same mesh can be used for multiphase flow calculations and ice geometry.…”
Section: Numerical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different geometric surface roughness distributions can result in different ice shapes, due to their influence on water runback characteristics and the resultant ice coverage. 26 Along different areas of real iced surface, the roughness should behave as different patterns or texture, according to the geometric configuration and atmospheric conditions. The surface roughness is known to make an important contribution to the convective heat transfer and surface water mass flow.…”
Section: Study Of Geometric Parameters Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%