2007
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.m700345-jlr200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fenofibrate reduces intestinal cholesterol absorption via PPARα-dependent modulation of NPC1L1 expression in mouse

Abstract: Fibrates, including fenofibrate, exert their biological effects by binding peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor a (PPARa), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-activated transcription factors. Treatment with PPARa agonists enhances fatty acid oxidation, decreases plasma triglycerides, and may promote reverse cholesterol transport. In addition, fibrate administration can reduce intestinal cholesterol absorption in patients, although the molecular mechanism for this effect is unknown. Bec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
77
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
6
77
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It could result from increased intrahepatic cholesterol concentrations and subsequently reduced SREBP2 (sterol regulatory element-binding protein 2) activity on PCSK9 gene transcription (5,17 ). However, fenofibrate has been shown in mice to reduce the intestinal absorption of dietary cholesterol, which actually depletes intrahepatic cholesterol stores (27 ). Together with our results showing reduced PCSK9 secretion from fenofibric acid-treated hepatoma cells, this strongly suggests that fenofibrate negatively modulates PCSK9 expression and/or secretion directly at the hepatocyte level.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…It could result from increased intrahepatic cholesterol concentrations and subsequently reduced SREBP2 (sterol regulatory element-binding protein 2) activity on PCSK9 gene transcription (5,17 ). However, fenofibrate has been shown in mice to reduce the intestinal absorption of dietary cholesterol, which actually depletes intrahepatic cholesterol stores (27 ). Together with our results showing reduced PCSK9 secretion from fenofibric acid-treated hepatoma cells, this strongly suggests that fenofibrate negatively modulates PCSK9 expression and/or secretion directly at the hepatocyte level.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…HFHC diet decreases expression of NPC1L1 presumably because of its high fat content ( 50,55 ). The resultant increase in BBM cholesterol content and ABCG5/G8 cholesterol effl ux activity under HFHC diet conditions leads to a back fl ux of cholesterol to BSM in the lumen of the small intestine so that the net level of cholesterol fl ux into the BBM becomes sensitive to the scavenger receptor-mediated infl ux contribution ( Fig.…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LXRs also play a central role in the transcriptional response to dietary cholesterol in mice, and directly or indirectly control a number of genes that are related to DHR96-regulated genes, including ABCG1, LPL, steroylCoA desaturase, NPC1, and NPC2 (Maxwell et al 2003;Rigamonti et al 2005;Kalaany and Mangelsdorf 2006). Finally, like DHR96, LXRs repress NPC1L1 expression, although it is not clear whether this regulation is direct (Duval et al 2006;Valasek et al 2007). Taken together, these results indicate that DHR96 and mammalian LXRs act through similar regulatory pathways to control cholesterol homeostasis.…”
Section: Dhr96 Represents An Ancestral Regulator Of Cholesterol Metabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mouse mutants for NPC1L1 display significantly reduced levels of cholesterol absorption and are insensitive to treatment with the anti-hypercholesterolemia drug ezetimibe, which acts as a specific NPC1L1 inhibitor (Davis et al 2008). Another major regulator of cholesterol homeostasis is the liver X receptor a (LXRa) nuclear receptor, which binds cholesterol metabolites and regulates the transcription of genes that control cholesterol transport and metabolism, including NPC1L1 (Duval et al 2006;Kalaany and Mangelsdorf 2006;Valasek et al 2007). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%